AMTR vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
AMTR and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMTR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. Both AMTR and ENFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMTR or ENFR.
Correlation
The correlation between AMTR and ENFR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMTR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AMTR:
3.62
ENFR:
2.76
AMTR:
5.03
ENFR:
3.67
AMTR:
1.67
ENFR:
1.49
AMTR:
9.35
ENFR:
3.78
AMTR:
33.97
ENFR:
21.10
AMTR:
1.44%
ENFR:
1.77%
AMTR:
13.51%
ENFR:
13.57%
AMTR:
-19.33%
ENFR:
-68.28%
AMTR:
-5.24%
ENFR:
-9.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMTR achieves a 44.69% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 36.14% return.
AMTR
44.69%
-1.78%
28.90%
45.08%
N/A
N/A
ENFR
36.14%
-6.11%
18.47%
37.03%
14.67%
6.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMTR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMTR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMTR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.60% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
AMTR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMTR drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTR and ENFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMTR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) is 5.44%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that AMTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.