PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATI vs. CC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATI vs. CC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and The Chemours Company (CC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATI achieves a 55.52% return, which is significantly lower than CC's 98.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ATI has outperformed CC with an annualized return of 29.95%, while CC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.


ATI

1D
-0.28%
1M
14.96%
YTD
55.52%
6M
80.90%
1Y
120.97%
3Y*
66.34%
5Y*
49.62%
10Y*
29.95%

CC

1D
4.17%
1M
-15.86%
YTD
98.90%
6M
83.64%
1Y
152.73%
3Y*
-8.36%
5Y*
-5.85%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATI vs. CC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
55.52%108.50%21.05%52.28%87.45%-5.01%-18.83%-5.10%-9.82%51.54%
CC
The Chemours Company
98.90%-27.57%-44.01%6.53%-5.99%39.85%45.61%-32.54%-42.45%127.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ATI and CC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015

0.45

The correlation between ATI and CC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ATI:

$4.02

CC:

-$3.65

PS Ratio

ATI:

4.11

CC:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATI:

$4.59B

CC:

$5.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATI:

$1.04B

CC:

$878.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATI:

$773.10M

CC:

$66.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATI vs. CC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATI
ATI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ATI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ATI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CC
CC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATI vs. CC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and The Chemours Company (CC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATICCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.41

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

2.73

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

3.38

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.26

8.07

+4.19

ATI vs. CC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATI Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the CC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATI and CC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATICCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.41

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

-0.11

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.25

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.11

+0.01

Drawdowns

ATI vs. CC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATI drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than CC's maximum drawdown of -86.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATI and CC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATICCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.72%

-86.15%

-8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.31%

-39.79%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.02%

-73.60%

+35.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

-76.42%

+33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.43%

-86.15%

+3.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-44.09%

+43.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-40.96%

-19.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.12%

16.67%

-6.55%

Volatility

ATI vs. CC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is 12.04%, while The Chemours Company (CC) has a volatility of 23.81%. This indicates that ATI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATICCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

23.81%

-11.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.93%

47.31%

-18.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.63%

64.31%

-22.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.97%

55.63%

-12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.51%

57.46%

-5.95%

Dividends

ATI vs. CC - Dividend Comparison

ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.51%5.51%
CC
The Chemours Company
1.51%4.35%5.92%3.17%3.27%2.98%4.03%5.53%2.98%0.24%0.54%10.82%

Financials

ATI vs. CC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and The Chemours Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.15B
1.38B
(ATI) Total Revenue
(CC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATI vs. CC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and The Chemours Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
15.4%
Portfolio components
ATI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 262.90M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

CC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

ATI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

CC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

ATI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 118.20M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

CC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATI and CC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CC has higher volatility (23.81%) compared to ATI (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATI dropped -94.72% vs CC's -86.15%.

ATI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATI and CC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer