ATI vs. CRS
ATI (Allegheny Technologies Incorporated) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Metal Fabrication industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, ATI returned 32.06%/yr vs 36.16%/yr for CRS. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ATI vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATI achieves a 73.93% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 83.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ATI has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 32.06%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 36.16% annualized return.
ATI
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 73.93%
- 6M
- 71.76%
- 1Y
- 139.19%
- 3Y*
- 71.97%
- 5Y*
- 54.82%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
CRS
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 33.17%
- YTD
- 83.81%
- 6M
- 73.58%
- 1Y
- 121.79%
- 3Y*
- 125.51%
- 5Y*
- 71.41%
- 10Y*
- 36.16%
ATI vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Allegheny Technologies Incorporated | 73.93% | 108.50% | 21.05% | 52.28% | 87.45% | -5.01% | -18.83% | -5.10% | -9.82% | 51.54% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 83.81% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATI and CRS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1999 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ATI and CRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ATI:
$4.02
CRS:
$9.51
ATI:
49.67
CRS:
60.82
ATI:
2.14
CRS:
0.05
ATI:
4.60
CRS:
9.62
ATI:
$4.59B
CRS:
$3.03B
ATI:
$1.04B
CRS:
$900.50M
ATI:
$773.10M
CRS:
$745.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATI vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
ATI
CRS
ATI vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.42 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 6.42 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 15.12 | -1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATI vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATI drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than CRS's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATI and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.72% | -84.68% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.31% | -19.08% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.02% | -28.74% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.02% | -41.86% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.43% | -74.70% | -7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -1.64% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -27.22% | -33.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 8.09% | +2.03% |
Volatility
ATI vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) at 10.56%. This indicates that ATI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.11% | 10.56% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.58% | 33.59% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.65% | 48.36% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.04% | 46.62% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.38% | 48.80% | +2.58% |
Dividends
ATI vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Allegheny Technologies Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.51% | 5.51% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
Financials
ATI vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATI vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison
ATI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 262.90M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
ATI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
ATI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 118.20M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATI and CRS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATI has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to CRS (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATI dropped -94.72% vs CRS's -84.68%.
ATI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATI and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer