PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATI vs. MLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATI vs. MLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATI achieves a 77.84% return, which is significantly higher than MLI's 22.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ATI has outperformed MLI with an annualized return of 32.35%, while MLI has yielded a comparatively lower 27.18% annualized return.


ATI

1D
1.37%
1M
25.76%
YTD
77.84%
6M
76.30%
1Y
147.38%
3Y*
73.24%
5Y*
57.10%
10Y*
32.35%

MLI

1D
1.54%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.23%
6M
19.55%
1Y
91.83%
3Y*
51.24%
5Y*
47.29%
10Y*
27.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATI vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
77.84%108.50%21.05%52.28%87.45%-5.01%-18.83%-5.10%-9.82%51.54%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
22.23%46.29%70.51%62.38%1.05%70.95%12.30%37.79%-33.10%-2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ATI and MLI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1999

0.53

The correlation between ATI and MLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

ATI:

$4.02

MLI:

$10.18

PE Ratio

ATI:

50.79

MLI:

13.71

PEG Ratio

ATI:

2.19

MLI:

0.89

PS Ratio

ATI:

4.70

MLI:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATI:

$4.59B

MLI:

$4.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATI:

$1.04B

MLI:

$871.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATI:

$773.10M

MLI:

$1.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATI vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATI
ATI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ATI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ATI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MLI
MLI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATI vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATIMLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.53

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.86

4.13

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

11.47

+3.16

ATI vs. MLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATI Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is comparable to the MLI Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATI and MLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATI vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATI drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than MLI's maximum drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATI and MLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATIMLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.72%

-61.72%

-33.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.31%

-22.33%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.02%

-27.79%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.02%

-27.79%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.43%

-52.95%

-29.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.68%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.72%

-16.03%

-44.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.12%

8.03%

+2.09%

Volatility

ATI vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 9.71%. This indicates that ATI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATIMLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

9.71%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.48%

25.79%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.65%

30.01%

+12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.03%

32.99%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.53%

35.79%

+15.74%

Dividends

ATI vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison

ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.51%5.51%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.86%0.87%1.01%1.27%1.69%0.88%1.14%1.26%1.71%9.60%0.94%1.11%

Financials

ATI vs. MLI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Mueller Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.15B
1.19B
(ATI) Total Revenue
(MLI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATI vs. MLI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Mueller Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
0
Portfolio components
ATI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 262.90M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

MLI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

MLI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

ATI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 118.20M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

MLI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATI and MLI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATI has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to MLI (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATI dropped -94.72% vs MLI's -61.72%.

ATI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATI and MLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer