CC vs. IOSP
CC (The Chemours Company) and IOSP (Innospec Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CC returned 13.99%/yr vs 6.61%/yr for IOSP. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CC vs. IOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC achieves a 93.43% return, which is significantly higher than IOSP's 6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CC has outperformed IOSP with an annualized return of 13.99%, while IOSP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.
CC
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- YTD
- 93.43%
- 6M
- 75.97%
- 1Y
- 132.66%
- 3Y*
- -9.21%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
IOSP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- -4.79%
- 3Y*
- -5.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
CC vs. IOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 93.43% | -27.57% | -44.01% | 6.53% | -5.99% | 39.85% | 45.61% | -32.54% | -42.45% | 127.24% |
IOSP Innospec Inc. | 6.54% | -28.94% | -9.57% | 21.46% | 15.25% | 0.77% | -11.00% | 69.43% | -11.48% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC and IOSP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CC and IOSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CC:
-$3.65
IOSP:
$4.58
CC:
0.44
IOSP:
1.12
CC:
$5.82B
IOSP:
$1.79B
CC:
$878.00M
IOSP:
$490.80M
CC:
$66.00M
IOSP:
$162.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC vs. IOSP — Risk / Return Rank
CC
IOSP
CC vs. IOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chemours Company (CC) and Innospec Inc. (IOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CC | IOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.99 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | -0.19 | +3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | -0.40 | +8.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CC | IOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | -0.20 | +2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.12 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.21 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.16 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
CC vs. IOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, smaller than the maximum IOSP drawdown of -91.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC and IOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC | IOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.15% | -91.17% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.79% | -25.48% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.60% | -48.42% | -25.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.42% | -48.42% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.15% | -48.42% | -37.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.63% | -36.16% | -9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.96% | -28.68% | -12.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.71% | 12.14% | +4.57% |
Volatility
CC vs. IOSP - Volatility Comparison
The Chemours Company (CC) has a higher volatility of 23.87% compared to Innospec Inc. (IOSP) at 7.93%. This indicates that CC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC | IOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.87% | 7.93% | +15.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.42% | 17.24% | +30.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.94% | 24.24% | +39.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.65% | 26.65% | +29.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.45% | 31.33% | +26.12% |
Dividends
CC vs. IOSP - Dividend Comparison
CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than IOSP's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 1.55% | 4.35% | 5.92% | 3.17% | 3.27% | 2.98% | 4.03% | 5.53% | 2.98% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 10.82% |
IOSP Innospec Inc. | 2.22% | 2.23% | 1.41% | 1.14% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.15% | 0.99% | 1.44% | 1.09% | 0.98% | 1.12% |
Financials
CC vs. IOSP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Chemours Company and Innospec Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CC vs. IOSP - Profitability Comparison
CC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
IOSP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innospec Inc. reported a gross profit of 123.50M and revenue of 453.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
CC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
IOSP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innospec Inc. reported an operating income of 36.50M and revenue of 453.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
CC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
IOSP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innospec Inc. reported a net income of 30.40M and revenue of 453.20M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CC and IOSP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CC has higher volatility (23.87%) compared to IOSP (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CC dropped -86.15% vs IOSP's -91.17%.
CC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CC and IOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer