PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATI vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ATI vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ATI vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
31.80%108.50%21.05%52.28%87.45%-5.01%-18.83%-5.10%-9.82%51.54%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
15.72%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Fundamentals

EPS

ATI:

$4.27

COST:

$25.63

PE Ratio

ATI:

35.43

COST:

38.88

PEG Ratio

ATI:

1.52

COST:

3.04

PS Ratio

ATI:

3.12

COST:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATI:

$4.59B

COST:

$286.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATI:

$1.02B

COST:

$19.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATI:

$781.50M

COST:

$12.73B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATI achieves a 31.80% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 15.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ATI has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 25.03%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 22.28% annualized return.


ATI

1D
3.98%
1M
-9.12%
YTD
31.80%
6M
82.21%
1Y
187.55%
3Y*
56.50%
5Y*
47.05%
10Y*
25.03%

COST

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
15.72%
6M
8.94%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
22.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATI vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATI
ATI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ATI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ATI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATI Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATI vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATICOSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.87

0.25

+3.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.81

0.50

+3.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.06

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.53

0.31

+7.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.24

0.61

+17.63

ATI vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATI Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATI and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATICOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87

0.25

+3.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.02

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.59

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ATI and COST is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ATI vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATI
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.51%5.51%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.52%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Drawdowns

ATI vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATI drawdown since its inception was -94.72%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATI and COST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ATICOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.72%

-53.39%

-41.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.31%

-19.35%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-31.40%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.43%

-31.40%

-51.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-6.95%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.03%

-13.40%

-47.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.45%

9.67%

+0.78%

Volatility

ATI vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.38%. This indicates that ATI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ATICOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.83%

4.38%

+12.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.91%

13.33%

+14.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.73%

20.08%

+28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.83%

22.51%

+20.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.93%

21.90%

+30.03%

Financials

ATI vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.18B
69.60B
(ATI) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATI vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.2%
-12.6%
Portfolio components
ATI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 273.40M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

ATI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported an operating income of 170.60M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

ATI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated reported a net income of 96.60M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.