CC vs. OLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CC (The Chemours Company) and OLN (Olin Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CC returned 13.99%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for OLN. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CC vs. OLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Chemours Company (CC) and Olin Corporation (OLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CC achieves a 93.43% return, which is significantly higher than OLN's 25.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CC has outperformed OLN with an annualized return of 13.99%, while OLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.

CC

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: -16.64%
• YTD: 93.43%
• 6M: 75.97%
• 1Y: 132.66%
• 3Y*: -9.21%
• 5Y*: -6.37%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

OLN

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: 25.53%
• 6M: 21.90%
• 1Y: 31.64%
• 3Y*: -18.53%
• 5Y*: -10.58%
• 10Y*: 4.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CC vs. OLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CC The Chemours Company	93.43%	-27.57%	-44.01%	6.53%	-5.99%	39.85%	45.61%	-32.54%	-42.45%	127.24%
OLN Olin Corporation	25.53%	-36.15%	-36.29%	3.46%	-6.63%	138.55%	50.81%	-10.77%	-41.88%	42.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CC and OLN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015	0.61

The correlation between CC and OLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS CC : -$3.65 OLN : -$1.11
PS Ratio CC : 0.44 OLN : 0.44
Total Revenue (TTM) CC : $5.82B OLN : $6.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) CC : $878.00M OLN : $352.80M
EBITDA (TTM) CC : $66.00M OLN : $374.70M

Return for Risk

CC vs. OLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CC

CC Risk / Return Rank: 84
CC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CC Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CC Martin Ratio Rank: 83

OLN

OLN Risk / Return Rank: 59
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CC vs. OLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chemours Company (CC) and Olin Corporation (OLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CC	OLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	0.57	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	1.15	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.14	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	1.01	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	2.38	+5.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CC vs. OLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the OLN Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CC and OLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CC	OLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	0.57	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	-0.24	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.09	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.14	-0.04

Drawdowns

CC vs. OLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CC drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, which is greater than OLN's maximum drawdown of -73.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC and OLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CC	OLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.15%	-73.80%	-12.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.79%	-31.45%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.60%	-69.26%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.42%	-71.87%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.15%	-73.80%	-12.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.63%	-57.91%	+12.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.96%	-24.95%	-16.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.71%	13.33%	+3.38%

Volatility

CC vs. OLN - Volatility Comparison

The Chemours Company (CC) has a higher volatility of 23.87% compared to Olin Corporation (OLN) at 12.80%. This indicates that CC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CC	OLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	12.80%	+11.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.42%	39.28%	+8.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.94%	55.93%	+8.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.65%	44.88%	+10.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.45%	47.13%	+10.32%

Dividends

CC vs. OLN - Dividend Comparison

CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than OLN's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CC The Chemours Company	1.55%	4.35%	5.92%	3.17%	3.27%	2.98%	4.03%	5.53%	2.98%	0.24%	0.54%	10.82%
OLN Olin Corporation	3.11%	3.84%	2.37%	1.48%	1.51%	1.39%	3.26%	4.64%	3.98%	2.25%	3.12%	4.63%

Financials

CC vs. OLN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Chemours Company and Olin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

OLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

OLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported an operating income of -78.30M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.0%.

CC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

OLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a net income of -83.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CC and OLN in my portfolio?

CC and OLN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CC or OLN?

CC has higher volatility (23.87%) compared to OLN (12.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CC dropped -86.15% vs OLN's -73.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.