CC vs. GH
CC (The Chemours Company) and GH (Guardant Health, Inc.) are both stocks. CC operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while GH operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, CC returned -5.86%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GH. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CC vs. GH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC achieves a 83.59% return, which is significantly higher than GH's 26.13% return.
CC
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 83.59%
- 6M
- 80.38%
- 1Y
- 104.36%
- 3Y*
- -10.63%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
GH
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 26.13%
- 6M
- 27.13%
- 1Y
- 162.17%
- 3Y*
- 53.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
CC vs. GH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 83.59% | -27.57% | -44.01% | 6.53% | -5.99% | 39.85% | 45.61% | -32.54% | -31.68% |
GH Guardant Health, Inc. | 26.13% | 234.34% | 12.94% | -0.55% | -72.81% | -22.39% | 64.93% | 107.87% | 35.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC and GH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between CC and GH shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CC:
-$3.65
GH:
-$3.40
CC:
0.42
GH:
15.19
CC:
$5.82B
GH:
$1.08B
CC:
$878.00M
GH:
$701.01M
CC:
$66.00M
GH:
-$411.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC vs. GH — Risk / Return Rank
CC
GH
CC vs. GH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chemours Company (CC) and Guardant Health, Inc. (GH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CC | GH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 4.95 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 12.27 | -6.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CC vs. GH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, smaller than the maximum GH drawdown of -91.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC and GH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC | GH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.15% | -91.03% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.79% | -32.98% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.60% | -59.79% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.42% | -87.84% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.40% | -28.07% | -20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.98% | -51.50% | +10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.41% | 13.27% | +4.14% |
Volatility
CC vs. GH - Volatility Comparison
The Chemours Company (CC) has a higher volatility of 13.83% compared to Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) at 13.07%. This indicates that CC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC | GH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.83% | 13.07% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.03% | 38.12% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.96% | 58.29% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.71% | 67.65% | -11.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.47% | 68.23% | -10.76% |
Dividends
CC vs. GH - Dividend Comparison
CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while GH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 1.63% | 4.35% | 5.92% | 3.17% | 3.27% | 2.98% | 4.03% | 5.53% | 2.98% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 10.82% |
GH Guardant Health, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CC vs. GH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Chemours Company and Guardant Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CC vs. GH - Profitability Comparison
CC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
GH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.75M and revenue of 301.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.
CC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
GH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported an operating income of -121.35M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.2%.
CC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
GH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a net income of -112.08M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in a net margin of -37.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CC and GH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CC has higher volatility (13.83%) compared to GH (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CC dropped -86.15% vs GH's -91.03%.
GH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CC and GH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer