PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CC vs. TROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CC vs. TROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Chemours Company (CC) and Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CC achieves a 70.76% return, which is significantly higher than TROX's 62.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CC has outperformed TROX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while TROX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.


CC

1D
-6.99%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
70.76%
6M
71.48%
1Y
92.41%
3Y*
-12.77%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
11.54%

TROX

1D
-8.99%
1M
-11.52%
YTD
62.29%
6M
59.99%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
-13.84%
5Y*
-17.94%
10Y*
6.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CC vs. TROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CC
The Chemours Company
70.76%-27.57%-44.01%6.53%-5.99%39.85%45.61%-32.54%-42.45%127.24%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
62.29%-55.57%-26.44%7.44%-41.10%67.29%32.51%49.45%-61.63%100.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CC and TROX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.68

The correlation between CC and TROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CC:

-$3.65

TROX:

-$2.26

PS Ratio

CC:

0.39

TROX:

0.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

CC:

$5.82B

TROX:

$2.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CC:

$878.00M

TROX:

$170.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

CC:

$66.00M

TROX:

$25.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CC vs. TROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CC
CC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TROX
TROX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CC vs. TROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chemours Company (CC) and Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCTROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

0.70

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

1.44

+3.86

CC vs. TROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CC Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the TROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CC and TROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CC vs. TROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CC drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, roughly equal to the maximum TROX drawdown of -90.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC and TROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCTROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.15%

-90.10%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.79%

-49.23%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.60%

-84.48%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.42%

-86.87%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.15%

-86.87%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.00%

-69.14%

+17.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-44.34%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.50%

23.82%

-6.32%

Volatility

CC vs. TROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Chemours Company (CC) is 15.15%, while Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) has a volatility of 20.03%. This indicates that CC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCTROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

20.03%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.63%

55.38%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.26%

90.18%

-25.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.80%

60.93%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.49%

64.10%

-6.61%

Dividends

CC vs. TROX - Dividend Comparison

CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than TROX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CC
The Chemours Company
1.75%4.35%5.92%3.17%3.27%2.98%4.03%5.53%2.98%0.24%0.54%10.82%
TROX
Tronox Holdings plc
2.99%8.39%4.97%3.53%3.65%1.50%1.92%1.58%2.31%0.88%3.73%25.58%

Financials

CC vs. TROX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Chemours Company and Tronox Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.38B
760.00M
(CC) Total Revenue
(TROX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CC vs. TROX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Chemours Company and Tronox Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
15.4%
0.0%
Portfolio components
CC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

TROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 44.00K and revenue of 760.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

TROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported an operating income of -27.00M and revenue of 760.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.6%.

CC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

TROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported a net income of -103.00K and revenue of 760.00M, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CC and TROX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TROX has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to CC (15.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CC dropped -86.15% vs TROX's -90.10%.

CC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CC and TROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer