CC vs. TROX
CC (The Chemours Company) and TROX (Tronox Holdings plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — CC in Specialty Chemicals, TROX in Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, CC returned 10.03%/yr vs 2.44%/yr for TROX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CC vs. TROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CC having a 42.10% return and TROX slightly lower at 41.88%. Over the past 10 years, CC has outperformed TROX with an annualized return of 10.03%, while TROX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.44% annualized return.
CC
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -12.62%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 42.10%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- -20.54%
- 5Y*
- -9.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
TROX
- 1D
- -6.71%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 41.88%
- 1Y
- 79.45%
- 3Y*
- -20.83%
- 5Y*
- -17.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.12M | $40.07M | $57.08M | |
| $15.03M | $14.10M | $21.40M |
CC vs. TROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 42.10% | -27.57% | -44.01% | 6.53% | -5.99% | 39.85% | 45.61% | -32.54% | -42.45% | 127.24% |
TROX Tronox Holdings plc | 41.88% | -55.57% | -26.44% | 7.44% | -41.10% | 67.29% | 32.51% | 49.45% | -61.63% | 100.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC and TROX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CC and TROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CC:
$2.50B
TROX:
$931.62M
CC:
-$4.10
TROX:
-$2.26
CC:
0.29
TROX:
0.32
CC:
$5.82B
TROX:
$2.92B
CC:
$878.00M
TROX:
$170.04M
CC:
$66.00M
TROX:
$25.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC vs. TROX — Risk / Return Rank
CC
TROX
CC vs. TROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chemours Company (CC) and Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CC | TROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 2.06 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | 4.29 | -2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CC vs. TROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC drawdown since its inception was -86.15%, roughly equal to the maximum TROX drawdown of -90.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC and TROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC | TROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.15% | -90.10% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.77% | -44.63% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.56% | -84.48% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.42% | -86.87% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.15% | -86.87% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.06% | -73.02% | +12.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -44.52% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.51% | 21.35% | -0.84% |
Volatility
CC vs. TROX - Volatility Comparison
The Chemours Company (CC) and Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) have volatilities of 15.48% and 15.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC | TROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.48% | 15.38% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.96% | 54.14% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.76% | 88.87% | -25.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 60.82% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.64% | 63.63% | -6.99% |
Dividends
CC vs. TROX - Dividend Comparison
CC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than TROX's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 2.11% | 4.35% | 5.92% | 3.17% | 3.27% | 2.98% | 4.03% | 5.53% | 2.98% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 10.82% |
TROX Tronox Holdings plc | 3.42% | 8.39% | 4.97% | 3.53% | 3.65% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.58% | 2.31% | 0.88% | 3.73% | 25.58% |
Financials
CC vs. TROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Chemours Company and Tronox Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CC vs. TROX - Profitability Comparison
CC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
TROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 44.00K and revenue of 760.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
TROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported an operating income of -27.00M and revenue of 760.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.6%.
CC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
TROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tronox Holdings plc reported a net income of -103.00K and revenue of 760.00M, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CC and TROX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CC has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to TROX (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CC dropped -86.15% vs TROX's -90.10%.
TROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CC and TROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer