ASM vs. EQT
ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ASM returned 11.05%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for EQT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASM vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 11.05%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.
ASM
- 1D
- 6.86%
- 1M
- -18.39%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 109.07%
- 5Y*
- 37.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
EQT
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -5.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
ASM vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 2.90% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.55% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM and EQT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.12 |
The correlation between ASM and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ASM:
$1.11B
EQT:
$32.47B
ASM:
$0.23
EQT:
$5.40
ASM:
28.13
EQT:
9.61
ASM:
0.08
EQT:
0.08
ASM:
9.37
EQT:
3.21
ASM:
4.02
EQT:
1.29
ASM:
$110.70M
EQT:
$10.03B
ASM:
$59.09M
EQT:
$6.43B
ASM:
$55.20M
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASM vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
ASM
EQT
ASM vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASM | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.00 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.22 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | -0.47 | +3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASM vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, roughly equal to the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASM | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -91.51% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.40% | -24.42% | -27.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.40% | -31.62% | -20.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.51% | -42.56% | -25.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.91% | -88.28% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.15% | -23.32% | -19.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.76% | -23.34% | -40.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.57% | 11.47% | +13.10% |
Volatility
ASM vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 26.77% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASM | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.77% | 8.36% | +18.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.36% | 21.09% | +44.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.16% | 32.56% | +49.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.03% | 42.79% | +23.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.72% | 48.90% | +20.82% |
Dividends
ASM vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
ASM vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASM vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASM and EQT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (26.77%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASM dropped -94.10% vs EQT's -91.51%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASM and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer