ASM vs. HL
ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ASM in Other Precious Metals & Mining, HL in Gold. Over the past 10 years, ASM returned 10.96%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for HL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASM vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has underperformed HL with an annualized return of 10.96%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
ASM
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -6.14%
- 1Y
- 83.95%
- 3Y*
- 113.87%
- 5Y*
- 40.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
HL
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -16.69%
- 6M
- -22.21%
- 1Y
- 177.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
ASM vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 3.38% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -16.69% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM and HL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, ASM and HL have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ASM:
$1.11B
HL:
$10.79B
ASM:
$0.23
HL:
$0.84
ASM:
28.26
HL:
19.00
ASM:
0.08
HL:
0.08
ASM:
9.41
HL:
6.76
ASM:
4.03
HL:
4.20
ASM:
$110.70M
HL:
$1.57B
ASM:
$59.09M
HL:
$788.95M
ASM:
$55.20M
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASM vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
ASM
HL
ASM vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASM | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 3.20 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 6.95 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASM vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, roughly equal to the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASM | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -97.92% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.40% | -55.81% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.40% | -55.81% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.94% | -57.07% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.91% | -82.45% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.88% | -49.74% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.74% | -69.92% | +6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.19% | 25.60% | -0.41% |
Volatility
ASM vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 25.99% compared to Hecla Mining Company (HL) at 20.82%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASM | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.99% | 20.82% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.58% | 54.33% | +11.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.30% | 73.18% | +9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.07% | 59.32% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.75% | 62.83% | +6.92% |
Dividends
ASM vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
ASM vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASM vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASM and HL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (25.99%) compared to HL (20.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASM dropped -94.10% vs HL's -97.92%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASM and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer