PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.06%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


ASHS

1D
-2.58%
1M
1.98%
YTD
20.07%
6M
23.64%
1Y
63.65%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
4.06%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
20.07%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHS and VOO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2014

0.33

The correlation between ASHS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHS
VOO

Technology

33.2%
39.1%

Industrials

18.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

16.5%
1.7%

Healthcare

6.2%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.8%

Financial Services

5.3%
10.9%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Energy

2.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

1.3%
10.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.8%

Technology

ASHS
33.2%
VOO
39.1%

Industrials

ASHS
18.7%
VOO
7.6%

Basic Materials

ASHS
16.5%
VOO
1.7%

Healthcare

ASHS
6.2%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHS
5.3%
VOO
9.8%

Financial Services

ASHS
5.3%
VOO
10.9%

Utilities

ASHS
2.3%
VOO
2.5%

Energy

ASHS
2.2%
VOO
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

ASHS
1.7%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

ASHS
1.3%
VOO
10.5%

Real Estate

ASHS
0.5%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHSVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.67

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

11.96

+2.29

ASHS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

-33.99%

-35.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-8.90%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

-18.69%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

-24.52%

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

-33.99%

-13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.70%

-3.14%

-27.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.49%

-3.68%

-44.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

1.99%

+2.49%

Volatility

ASHS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that ASHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

4.83%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

9.82%

+8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

12.46%

+10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.60%

16.91%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

18.02%

+7.58%

ASHS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHS and VOO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHS has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 4.06% for ASHS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

ASHS is categorized as China Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.03% for VOO.

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer