ASHR vs. HYLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB).
ASHR and HYLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. HYLB is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It was launched on Dec 7, 2016. Both ASHR and HYLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASHR vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHR vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | -0.64% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.81% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 5.04% | 14.06% | -1.80% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than HYLB's -0.81% return.
ASHR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- -2.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
HYLB
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASHR vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
ASHR
HYLB
ASHR vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHR | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.80 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.73 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 9.04 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHR | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.51 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.56 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and HYLB is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ASHR vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than HYLB's 6.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.32% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and HYLB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHR | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -22.91% | -28.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -3.88% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.44% | -15.54% | -30.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.87% | -1.84% | -22.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.34% | -2.47% | -26.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 0.74% | +1.93% |
Volatility
ASHR vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 2.04%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHR | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 2.04% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 2.71% | +8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 5.43% | +13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 7.44% | +16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 8.23% | +15.90% |