HYLB vs. FTSL
HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYLB is passively managed, while FTSL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYLB returned 3.93%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for FTSL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
HYLB vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLB achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 0.65% return.
HYLB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FTSL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
HYLB vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 5.04% | 14.06% | -1.80% | 6.00% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 0.65% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLB and FTSL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016 | 0.47 |
The correlation between HYLB and FTSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLB vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
HYLB
FTSL
HYLB vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLB | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.81 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 6.72 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLB vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FTSL drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLB | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -22.67% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.27% | -2.33% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.51% | -2.66% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.54% | -6.96% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.03% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -0.76% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.63% | -0.10% |
Volatility
HYLB vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 0.33%. This indicates that HYLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLB | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 0.33% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 1.96% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 2.12% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 3.35% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.16% | 5.19% | +2.97% |
HYLB vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLB vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, which matches FTSL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.46% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.48% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLB and FTSL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYLB has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to FTSL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLB dropped -22.91% vs FTSL's -22.67%.
On 5-year performance, FTSL leads with 4.99% vs 3.93% for HYLB. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTSL has performed better with a 4.99% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 6.48%, compared with 6.46% for FTSL.
They also come from different issuers: DWS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HYLB and 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYLB and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer