PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLB vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLB vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLB achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.54% return.


HYLB

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.27%
6M
1.16%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.69%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M
$41.71M$36.91M$41.99M

HYLB vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.76%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-1.80%6.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLB and BND is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016

0.33

Over the past year, HYLB and BND have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLB vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYLB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYLBBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.12

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

0.99

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

2.48

+7.34

HYLB vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLB and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYLB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLB drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLB and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLBBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-18.58%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-2.68%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.51%

-4.81%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-17.91%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-3.15%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-3.06%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

1.07%

-0.53%

Volatility

HYLB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) is 0.79%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that HYLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLBBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.98%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

2.90%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

3.70%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

6.03%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

5.53%

+2.59%

HYLB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HYLB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

HYLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.97%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLB and BND have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to HYLB (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLB dropped -22.91% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 3.86% vs -0.42% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 3.86% return vs -0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HYLB.

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 3.69% for BND.

HYLB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HYLB and 0.03% for BND.

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLB and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer