ASEA vs. XLG

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASEA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASEA returned 7.65%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for XLG. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ASEA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

ASEA vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 16.39% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 7.65%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.

ASEA

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 7.14%
• 6M: 9.57%
• YTD: 16.39%
• 1Y: 28.24%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 7.65%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

XLG

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.71%
• 6M: 2.67%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 1Y: 12.21%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 16.25%
• ALL TIME*: 11.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	$593.31K	$523.08K	$605.79K
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	$60.47M	$91.92M	$104.94M

ASEA vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	16.39%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	5.24%	4.66%	-7.88%	8.34%	-7.58%	35.06%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	1.55%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and XLG is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011	0.52

The correlation between ASEA and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASEA vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASEA	XLG
Financial Services	60.3%	9.7%
Industrials	15.6%	2.9%
Communication Services	8.0%	13.5%
Utilities	4.3%	0.8%
Energy	3.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	5.0%
Basic Materials	1.5%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	10.0%
Technology	-	49.5%

Return for Risk

ASEA vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 34
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASEA	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	0.88	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.28	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.16	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.02	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	3.29	+5.55

ASEA vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASEA	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.16%	-52.39%	+8.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-12.41%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.20%	-20.70%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.20%	-28.02%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.16%	-30.46%	-13.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-6.96%	+5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-7.62%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	3.84%	-0.71%

Volatility

ASEA vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 3.50%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASEA	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	4.47%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	11.10%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	14.39%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	18.84%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	18.89%	-1.40%

ASEA vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASEA vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.71%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.66%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASEA and XLG in my portfolio?

ASEA and XLG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASEA or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to ASEA (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, ASEA or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.25% vs 7.65% for ASEA. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASEA or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASEA or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASEA or XLG?

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

What is the main difference between ASEA and XLG?

ASEA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASEA and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.