XLG vs. TOPT
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and TOPT (iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while TOPT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XLG returned 28.88% vs 30.44% for TOPT. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
XLG vs. TOPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than TOPT's 9.30% return.
XLG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
TOPT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG vs. TOPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 8.03% | 19.51% | 3.90% |
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | 9.30% | 20.35% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and TOPT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between XLG and TOPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLG vs. TOPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLG
TOPT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLG
TOPT
Communication Services
XLG
TOPT
Consumer Cyclical
XLG
TOPT
Financial Services
XLG
TOPT
Healthcare
XLG
TOPT
Consumer Defensive
XLG
TOPT
Energy
XLG
TOPT
Industrials
XLG
TOPT
-
Basic Materials
XLG
TOPT
-
Real Estate
XLG
-
TOPT
-
Utilities
XLG
-
TOPT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. TOPT — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
TOPT
XLG vs. TOPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLG | TOPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.33 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 8.81 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLG | TOPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.24 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.14 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
XLG vs. TOPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than TOPT's maximum drawdown of -21.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and TOPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | TOPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -21.21% | -31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -13.13% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.93% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -3.47% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.46% | -0.16% |
Volatility
XLG vs. TOPT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 3.19%, while iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | TOPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.41% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 10.15% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 13.67% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 19.80% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 19.80% | -0.96% |
XLG vs. TOPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLG and TOPT have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLG vs. TOPT - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than TOPT's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOPT iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XLG and TOPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TOPT has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs TOPT's -21.21%.
On 1-year performance, TOPT leads with 30.44% vs 28.88% for XLG. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TOPT has performed better with a 30.44% return vs 28.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG and TOPT have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.35% for TOPT.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while TOPT is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while TOPT tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
TOPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and TOPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer