PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLG vs. TOPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLG vs. TOPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than TOPT's 9.30% return.


XLG

1D
0.42%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.64%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
17.28%

TOPT

1D
0.32%
1M
4.89%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.82%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. TOPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
8.03%19.51%3.90%
TOPT
iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF
9.30%20.35%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and TOPT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.98

The correlation between XLG and TOPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLG vs. TOPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLG
TOPT

Technology

43.9%
43.6%

Communication Services

17.1%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.2%

Financial Services

9.6%
12.4%

Healthcare

7.0%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.8%

Energy

2.7%
3.0%

Industrials

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLG
43.9%
TOPT
43.6%

Communication Services

XLG
17.1%
TOPT
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLG
11.3%
TOPT
9.2%

Financial Services

XLG
9.6%
TOPT
12.4%

Healthcare

XLG
7.0%
TOPT
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

XLG
5.8%
TOPT
4.8%

Energy

XLG
2.7%
TOPT
3.0%

Industrials

XLG
1.9%
TOPT

-

Basic Materials

XLG
0.6%
TOPT

-

Real Estate

XLG

-

TOPT

-

Utilities

XLG

-

TOPT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLG vs. TOPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TOPT
TOPT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TOPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOPT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TOPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOPT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. TOPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLGTOPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.33

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

8.81

-0.05

XLG vs. TOPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the TOPT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and TOPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLGTOPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.24

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.14

-0.51

Drawdowns

XLG vs. TOPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than TOPT's maximum drawdown of -21.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and TOPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLGTOPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-21.21%

-31.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-13.13%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.93%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-3.47%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.46%

-0.16%

Volatility

XLG vs. TOPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 3.19%, while iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLGTOPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.41%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

10.15%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

13.67%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

19.80%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

19.80%

-0.96%

XLG vs. TOPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLG and TOPT have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLG vs. TOPT - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than TOPT's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TOPT
iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF
0.35%0.38%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XLG and TOPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TOPT has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs TOPT's -21.21%.

On 1-year performance, TOPT leads with 30.44% vs 28.88% for XLG. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TOPT has performed better with a 30.44% return vs 28.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG and TOPT have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.35% for TOPT.

XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while TOPT is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while TOPT tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

TOPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLG and TOPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer