XLG vs. VOO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XLG tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index while VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 16.44%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for VOO. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

XLG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 16.44%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.

XLG

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: 16.44%
• ALL TIME*: 11.40%

VOO

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 9.53%
• YTD: 11.72%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 15.17%
• ALL TIME*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	$3.97B	$3.80B	$5.49B
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	$59.56M	$59.06M	$102.51M

XLG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	4.68%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	11.72%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and VOO is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.96

The correlation between XLG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLG	VOO
Technology	49.8%	38.6%
Communication Services	13.0%	9.9%
Financial Services	10.3%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.5%
Healthcare	6.8%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	4.5%
Energy	2.5%	3.0%
Industrials	1.9%	8.5%
Utilities	0.7%	2.2%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

XLG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 45
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 78
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLG	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.83	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.53	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	2.63	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	11.23	-6.74

XLG vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLG	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.39%	-33.99%	-18.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-8.90%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.70%	-18.69%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-24.52%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.46%	-33.99%	+3.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	0.00%	-4.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-3.67%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	2.08%	+1.90%

Volatility

XLG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that XLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLG	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	3.81%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	10.18%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.73%	12.80%	+1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	16.95%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	18.02%	+0.91%

XLG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.64%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLG and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, XLG and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XLG or VOO?

XLG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, XLG or VOO?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.44% vs 15.17% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLG or VOO?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 15.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLG or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLG or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.

What is the main difference between XLG and VOO?

XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.