PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLG vs. MGK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XLGMGK
YTD Return23.67%21.61%
1Y Return30.64%31.50%
3Y Return (Ann)11.05%9.19%
5Y Return (Ann)16.82%19.39%
10Y Return (Ann)12.87%16.02%
Sharpe Ratio2.101.82
Daily Std Dev15.01%17.72%
Max Drawdown-53.81%-48.36%
Current Drawdown-3.17%-4.63%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between XLG and MGK is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XLG vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 23.67% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 21.61% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 12.87%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
319.92%
652.11%
XLG
MGK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLG vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for MGK: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLG vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLG, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLG, currently valued at 9.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.90
MGK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MGK, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MGK, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MGK, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MGK, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MGK, currently valued at 8.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.29

XLG vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which roughly equals the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of XLG and MGK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.10
1.82
XLG
MGK

Dividends

XLG vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than MGK's 0.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.77%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%1.25%1.29%

Drawdowns

XLG vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -53.81%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and MGK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-3.17%
-4.63%
XLG
MGK

Volatility

XLG vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 5.14%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.14%
5.87%
XLG
MGK