PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLG vs. MGK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and MGK is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

XLG vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.26%
10.19%
XLG
MGK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLG:

2.20

MGK:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

XLG:

2.88

MGK:

2.46

Omega Ratio

XLG:

1.40

MGK:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

XLG:

3.03

MGK:

2.51

Martin Ratio

XLG:

12.09

MGK:

9.27

Ulcer Index

XLG:

2.83%

MGK:

3.68%

Daily Std Dev

XLG:

15.55%

MGK:

18.16%

Max Drawdown

XLG:

-52.39%

MGK:

-48.36%

Current Drawdown

XLG:

-2.21%

MGK:

-2.93%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLG having a 1.04% return and MGK slightly lower at 1.02%. Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 15.41%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.70% annualized return.


XLG

YTD

1.04%

1M

-0.02%

6M

9.23%

1Y

30.76%

5Y*

17.25%

10Y*

15.41%

MGK

YTD

1.02%

1M

-0.48%

6M

10.07%

1Y

30.02%

5Y*

18.44%

10Y*

16.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLG vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for MGK: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLG vs. MGK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLG is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLG is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLG is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLG is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLG is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLG is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGK is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGK is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGK is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGK is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGK is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGK is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLG vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.201.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.882.46
The chart of Omega ratio for XLG, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.401.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLG, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.032.51
The chart of Martin ratio for XLG, currently valued at 12.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.099.27
XLG
MGK

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and MGK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.20
1.88
XLG
MGK

Dividends

XLG vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than MGK's 0.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.71%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%1.25%

Drawdowns

XLG vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and MGK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.21%
-2.93%
XLG
MGK

Volatility

XLG vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 5.70%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.70%
6.43%
XLG
MGK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab