ARWG vs. LRNZ
ARWG (Archer Growth ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARWG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.
Performance
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARWG
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRNZ
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | -2.25% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARWG and LRNZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARWG drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -5.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARWG and LRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARWG | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.79% | -5.22% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -5.22% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -2.24% | -0.96% |
Volatility
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARWG | LRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.46% | 36.71% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 36.71% | -13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 36.71% | -13.25% |
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARWG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARWG vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison
ARWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | 0.13% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARWG and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ARWG.
ARWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
They also come from different issuers: Archer Funds and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ARWG and 0.68% for LRNZ.
Find the right allocation for ARWG and LRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer