ARWG vs. DGRO
ARWG (Archer Growth ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ARWG is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARWG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ARWG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARWG achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.84% return.
ARWG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
ARWG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | 8.13% | -0.95% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.84% | -0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARWG and DGRO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARWG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ARWG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRO
ARWG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Growth ETF (ARWG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARWG | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARWG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARWG drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARWG and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARWG | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.79% | -35.10% | +22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.21% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -3.43% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
ARWG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARWG | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.78% | 9.55% | +13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 13.80% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 16.63% | +6.15% |
ARWG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARWG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARWG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ARWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DGRO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARWG Archer Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARWG and DGRO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ARWG.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.13% for ARWG.
They also come from different issuers: Archer Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ARWG and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for ARWG and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer