PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMH vs. SNSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMH vs. SNSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SNSR

1D
-0.45%
1M
19.62%
YTD
44.93%
6M
43.21%
1Y
49.79%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. SNSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and SNSR is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMH vs. SNSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMH

SNSR
SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. SNSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. SNSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMHSNSRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

0.60

+471,499.54

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. SNSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum SNSR drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and SNSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMHSNSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-38.46%

+36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-9.50%

+9.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

Volatility

ARMH vs. SNSR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMHSNSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

23.90%

+89.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

25.16%

+87.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

24.67%

+88.33%

ARMH vs. SNSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SNSR's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARMH vs. SNSR - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
0.37%0.54%0.73%0.74%0.82%0.43%0.21%1.12%1.25%1.11%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMH and SNSR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.68% for SNSR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and SNSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer