ARMH vs. SNSR
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while SNSR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SNSR.
Performance
ARMH vs. SNSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- YTD
- 44.93%
- 6M
- 43.21%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. SNSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and SNSR is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. SNSR — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
SNSR
ARMH vs. SNSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 471,500.14 | 0.60 | +471,499.54 |
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. SNSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum SNSR drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and SNSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -38.46% | +36.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -9.50% | +9.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. SNSR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | SNSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.00% | 23.90% | +89.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 25.16% | +87.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 24.67% | +88.33% |
ARMH vs. SNSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SNSR's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. SNSR - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and SNSR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.
SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.68% for SNSR.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and SNSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer