ARMH vs. IGV
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while IGV is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
ARMH vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 1Y
- -13.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
ARMH vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and IGV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGV
ARMH vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -63.45% | +31.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -21.29% | -10.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -14.47% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.66% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 28.74% | +76.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 28.10% | +77.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 26.41% | +79.17% |
ARMH vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and IGV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.39% for IGV.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer