AR vs. RRC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC).

Performance

AR vs. RRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AR vs. RRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AR Antero Resources Corporation	23.16%	-1.68%	54.54%	-26.82%	77.09%	221.10%	91.23%	-69.65%	-50.58%	-19.66%
RRC Range Resources Corporation	28.43%	-1.05%	19.35%	23.05%	41.10%	166.12%	38.14%	-48.60%	-43.60%	-50.15%

Fundamentals

EPS AR : $2.03 RRC : $2.40
PE Ratio AR : 20.88 RRC : 18.85
PEG Ratio AR : 0.08 RRC : 0.31
PS Ratio AR : 2.55 RRC : 3.77
Total Revenue (TTM) AR : $5.20B RRC : $2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) AR : $1.20B RRC : $985.82M
EBITDA (TTM) AR : $1.75B RRC : $1.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly lower than RRC's 28.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AR has outperformed RRC with an annualized return of 5.53%, while RRC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.

AR

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 15.29%
• YTD: 23.16%
• 6M: 26.46%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 31.34%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

RRC

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 28.43%
• 6M: 20.61%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 33.53%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AR vs. RRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AR

AR Risk / Return Rank: 44
AR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

RRC

RRC Risk / Return Rank: 53
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AR vs. RRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AR	RRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	0.39	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	0.73	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	0.68	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	1.16	-0.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AR vs. RRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AR Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the RRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AR and RRC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AR	RRC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	0.39	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.72	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.07	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.17	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AR and RRC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AR vs. RRC - Dividend Comparison

AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AR Antero Resources Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RRC Range Resources Corporation	0.82%	1.02%	0.89%	1.05%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.84%	0.47%	0.23%	0.65%

Drawdowns

AR vs. RRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum RRC drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and RRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AR	RRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.01%	-97.86%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.77%	-24.15%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.39%	-37.66%	-20.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.78%	-95.72%	-2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.04%	-48.28%	+11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.62%	-46.57%	-15.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.19%	14.09%	+6.10%

Volatility

AR vs. RRC - Volatility Comparison

Antero Resources Corporation (AR) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to Range Resources Corporation (RRC) at 8.58%. This indicates that AR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AR	RRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.06%	8.58%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.73%	25.20%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.43%	37.01%	+7.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.32%	46.94%	+2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.77%	56.88%	+3.89%

Financials

AR vs. RRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Antero Resources Corporation and Range Resources Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 373.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

RRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.70M and revenue of 655.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

AR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 318.00M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

RRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 119.08M and revenue of 655.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

AR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 193.68M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.

RRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a net income of 144.31M and revenue of 655.59M, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.