RRC vs. GPOR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR).

Performance

RRC vs. GPOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RRC vs. GPOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RRC Range Resources Corporation	28.43%	-1.05%	19.35%	23.05%	41.10%	27.08%
GPOR Gulfport Energy Corporation	1.72%	12.92%	38.29%	80.88%	2.24%	5.91%

Fundamentals

EPS RRC : $2.40 GPOR : $21.75
PE Ratio RRC : 18.85 GPOR : 9.73
PEG Ratio RRC : 0.31 GPOR : 0.10
PS Ratio RRC : 3.77 GPOR : 2.54
Total Revenue (TTM) RRC : $2.87B GPOR : $1.52B
Gross Profit (TTM) RRC : $985.82M GPOR : $1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) RRC : $1.14B GPOR : $870.09M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 28.43% return, which is significantly higher than GPOR's 1.72% return.

RRC

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 9.70%
• YTD: 28.43%
• 6M: 20.61%
• 1Y: 14.24%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 33.53%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

GPOR

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 16.90%
• 1Y: 14.90%
• 3Y*: 38.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RRC vs. GPOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC

RRC Risk / Return Rank: 53
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

GPOR

GPOR Risk / Return Rank: 54
GPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
GPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRC vs. GPOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RRC	GPOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	0.40	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	0.74	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.71	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	1.38	-0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RRC vs. GPOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the GPOR Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and GPOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RRC	GPOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	0.40	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.67	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and GPOR is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RRC vs. GPOR - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while GPOR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RRC Range Resources Corporation	0.82%	1.02%	0.89%	1.05%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.84%	0.47%	0.23%	0.65%
GPOR Gulfport Energy Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RRC vs. GPOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than GPOR's maximum drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and GPOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRC	GPOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.86%	-43.22%	-54.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.15%	-21.77%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.28%	-4.91%	-43.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.57%	-10.52%	-36.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.09%	11.23%	+2.86%

Volatility

RRC vs. GPOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is 8.58%, while Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that RRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRC	GPOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	10.08%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.20%	25.86%	-0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.01%	37.36%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.94%	39.63%	+7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.88%	39.63%	+17.25%

Financials