PortfoliosLab logo
RRC vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and LNG is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RRC vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RRC:

0.29

LNG:

1.66

Sortino Ratio

RRC:

0.49

LNG:

2.13

Omega Ratio

RRC:

1.06

LNG:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

RRC:

0.09

LNG:

2.20

Martin Ratio

RRC:

0.44

LNG:

6.92

Ulcer Index

RRC:

14.77%

LNG:

7.00%

Daily Std Dev

RRC:

37.31%

LNG:

29.25%

Max Drawdown

RRC:

-97.86%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

RRC:

-55.78%

LNG:

-8.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RRC:

$9.32B

LNG:

$51.35B

EPS

RRC:

$1.11

LNG:

$13.63

PE Ratio

RRC:

35.14

LNG:

16.91

PEG Ratio

RRC:

1.78

LNG:

2.09

PS Ratio

RRC:

3.57

LNG:

3.07

PB Ratio

RRC:

2.30

LNG:

9.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

RRC:

$2.59B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RRC:

$760.69M

LNG:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

RRC:

$750.33M

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -3.86%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


RRC

YTD

8.65%

1M

16.80%

6M

13.70%

1Y

10.82%

5Y*

49.72%

10Y*

-3.86%

LNG

YTD

7.74%

1M

4.84%

6M

7.73%

1Y

48.11%

5Y*

42.93%

10Y*

12.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RRC vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RRC is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RRC is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RRC is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RRC is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RRC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RRC is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RRC vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RRC vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than LNG's 0.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
0.85%0.89%1.05%0.64%0.00%0.00%1.65%0.84%0.47%0.23%0.65%0.30%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.84%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RRC vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RRC vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 8.40%. This indicates that RRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RRC vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Range Resources Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
846.33M
5.44B
(RRC) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RRC vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Range Resources Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
43.3%
20.0%
(RRC) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
RRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Range Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 366.09M and revenue of 846.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

RRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Range Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 311.02M and revenue of 846.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

RRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Range Resources Corporation reported a net income of 97.05M and revenue of 846.33M, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.