RRC vs. LNG
RRC (Range Resources Corporation) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — RRC in Oil & Gas E&P, LNG in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 10 years, RRC returned -0.99%/yr vs 21.58%/yr for LNG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RRC vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 21.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -0.99%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.58% annualized return.
RRC
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- -10.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- -0.99%
LNG
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 21.09%
- 6M
- 22.79%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.93%
- 10Y*
- 21.58%
RRC vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRC Range Resources Corporation | 4.66% | -1.05% | 19.35% | 23.05% | 41.10% | 166.12% | 38.14% | -48.60% | -43.60% | -50.15% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 21.09% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RRC and LNG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.30 |
The correlation between RRC and LNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RRC:
$8.68B
LNG:
$49.30B
RRC:
$3.78
LNG:
$6.80
RRC:
9.71
LNG:
34.44
RRC:
0.16
LNG:
0.18
RRC:
2.76
LNG:
2.51
RRC:
1.89
LNG:
13.13
RRC:
$3.18B
LNG:
$20.28B
RRC:
$689.78M
LNG:
$5.52B
RRC:
$1.61B
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RRC vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
RRC
LNG
RRC vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RRC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 0.07 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 0.14 | -0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RRC vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RRC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.86% | -97.84% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.43% | -24.09% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.03% | -24.87% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.66% | -24.87% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.56% | -57.53% | -38.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.85% | -20.93% | -36.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.61% | -43.13% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 12.35% | +0.74% |
Volatility
RRC vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) have volatilities of 7.93% and 7.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RRC | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 7.77% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | 21.88% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 27.23% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 30.26% | +14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.45% | 32.35% | +24.10% |
Dividends
RRC vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than LNG's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RRC Range Resources Corporation | 1.03% | 1.02% | 0.89% | 1.05% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.84% | 0.47% | 0.23% | 0.65% |
Financials
RRC vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Range Resources Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RRC vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
RRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
RRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a net income of 341.63M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RRC and LNG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RRC has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to LNG (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRC dropped -97.86% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RRC and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer