AR vs. EQT
Compare and contrast key facts about Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and EQT Corporation (EQT).
Performance
AR vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AR vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 23.16% | -1.68% | 54.54% | -26.82% | 77.09% | 221.10% | 91.23% | -69.65% | -50.58% | -19.66% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 19.07% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Fundamentals
AR:
$13.26B
EQT:
$39.75B
AR:
$2.03
EQT:
$3.30
AR:
20.88
EQT:
19.30
AR:
0.08
EQT:
0.13
AR:
2.55
EQT:
4.55
AR:
1.76
EQT:
1.67
AR:
$5.20B
EQT:
$8.64B
AR:
$1.20B
EQT:
$8.42B
AR:
$1.75B
EQT:
$5.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 19.07% return. Over the past 10 years, AR has underperformed EQT with an annualized return of 5.53%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.68% annualized return.
AR
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- 15.29%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 31.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
EQT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 29.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AR vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
AR
EQT
AR vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AR | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 0.57 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 0.95 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.17 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 2.31 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AR | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.57 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.14 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.32 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between AR and EQT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AR vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
AR vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and EQT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AR | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.01% | -91.51% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.77% | -18.39% | -13.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.39% | -42.56% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.78% | -88.28% | -9.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.04% | -6.32% | -30.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.62% | -23.38% | -38.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.19% | 9.29% | +10.90% |
Volatility
AR vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Antero Resources Corporation (AR) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.04%. This indicates that AR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AR | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.06% | 8.04% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.73% | 23.63% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 35.89% | +8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 43.78% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.77% | 48.95% | +11.82% |
Financials
AR vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Resources Corporation and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities