RRC vs. AMLP

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of -4.38%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and AMLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than AMLP's 5.90% yield.

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and AMLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) has a higher volatility of 12.12% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 6.90%. This indicates that RRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.