RRC vs. AMLP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RRC (Range Resources Corporation) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, RRC returned -0.99%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RRC vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRC achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RRC has underperformed AMLP with an annualized return of -0.99%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.53% annualized return.

RRC

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -10.31%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 2.71%
• 1Y: -10.37%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 18.95%
• 10Y*: -0.99%

AMLP

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -5.26%
• YTD: 14.23%
• 6M: 13.82%
• 1Y: 15.28%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 15.96%
• 10Y*: 6.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RRC vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RRC Range Resources Corporation	4.66%	-1.05%	19.35%	23.05%	41.10%	166.12%	38.14%	-48.60%	-43.60%	-50.15%
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	14.23%	5.78%	22.76%	21.40%	25.47%	39.09%	-32.26%	5.99%	-12.67%	-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RRC and AMLP is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010	0.48

The correlation between RRC and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RRC vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRC

RRC Risk / Return Rank: 27
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 35
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRC vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Resources Corporation (RRC) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RRC	AMLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	1.27	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	1.81	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.22	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.72	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	5.16	-5.96

RRC vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRC and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RRC vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRC drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRC and AMLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RRC	AMLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.86%	-77.19%	-20.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.43%	-8.94%	-14.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-14.27%	-13.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.66%	-20.92%	-16.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.56%	-72.62%	-22.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.85%	-5.82%	-52.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.61%	-17.36%	-29.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.09%	2.97%	+10.12%

Volatility

RRC vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.02%. This indicates that RRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RRC	AMLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	5.02%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.88%	9.02%	+12.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.40%	12.11%	+20.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.92%	19.77%	+25.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.45%	27.68%	+28.77%

Dividends

RRC vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than AMLP's 7.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.78%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
RRC Range Resources Corporation	1.03%	1.02%	0.89%	1.05%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.84%	0.47%	0.23%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RRC and AMLP in my portfolio?

RRC and AMLP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RRC or AMLP?

RRC has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to AMLP (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRC dropped -97.86% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.