AR vs. BTU
AR (Antero Resources Corporation) and BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — AR in Oil & Gas E&P, BTU in Thermal Coal. Over the past 5 years, AR returned 21.59%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for BTU. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AR vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -27.83% return.
AR
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.11%
BTU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- YTD
- -27.83%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $172.18M | $160.27M | $167.10M | |
| $64.45M | $57.10M | $82.42M |
AR vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 4.88% | -1.68% | 54.54% | -26.82% | 77.09% | 221.10% | 91.23% | -69.65% | -50.58% | -16.70% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | -27.83% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 31.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AR and BTU is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.31 |
The correlation between AR and BTU shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AR:
$11.11B
BTU:
$2.60B
AR:
$3.48
BTU:
-$0.98
AR:
1.93
BTU:
0.66
AR:
$5.84B
BTU:
$3.90B
AR:
$2.66B
BTU:
$260.30M
AR:
$2.15B
BTU:
$333.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AR vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank
AR
BTU
AR vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AR | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.72 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 1.48 | -1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AR vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and BTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AR | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.01% | -98.07% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.42% | -47.12% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.19% | -65.14% | +31.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.39% | -67.44% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.39% | -48.36% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.20% | -48.00% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.18% | 22.79% | -9.61% |
Volatility
AR vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) is 10.01%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that AR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AR | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 14.54% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.62% | 41.93% | -15.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.17% | 58.35% | -21.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 63.02% | -15.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.69% | 77.42% | -16.73% |
Dividends
AR vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.41% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% |
Financials
AR vs. BTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Resources Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AR vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison
AR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 108.60M and revenue of 973.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.
AR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 375.46M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -46.10M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.
AR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 278.66M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of -32.40M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AR and BTU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTU has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to AR (10.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AR dropped -99.01% vs BTU's -98.07%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AR and BTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer