PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AR vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AR and BTU is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

AR vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
49.25%
-61.62%
AR
BTU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AR:

0.33

BTU:

-1.24

Sortino Ratio

AR:

0.71

BTU:

-2.04

Omega Ratio

AR:

1.10

BTU:

0.76

Calmar Ratio

AR:

0.22

BTU:

-0.74

Martin Ratio

AR:

0.97

BTU:

-2.13

Ulcer Index

AR:

14.24%

BTU:

26.21%

Daily Std Dev

AR:

42.18%

BTU:

44.82%

Max Drawdown

AR:

-98.97%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

AR:

-48.45%

BTU:

-75.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AR:

$10.41B

BTU:

$1.27B

EPS

AR:

$0.18

BTU:

$2.73

PE Ratio

AR:

185.89

BTU:

3.84

PEG Ratio

AR:

0.42

BTU:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AR:

$3.27B

BTU:

$3.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AR:

$3.87B

BTU:

$442.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

AR:

$597.21M

BTU:

$745.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a -4.54% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -49.76% return.


AR

YTD

-4.54%

1M

-8.03%

6M

11.57%

1Y

15.54%

5Y*

112.92%

10Y*

-0.92%

BTU

YTD

-49.76%

1M

-17.69%

6M

-60.06%

1Y

-54.48%

5Y*

29.10%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AR vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AR is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AR is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AR is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AR is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AR is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AR is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AR vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AR, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
AR: 0.33
BTU: -1.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for AR, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
AR: 0.71
BTU: -2.04
The chart of Omega ratio for AR, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
AR: 1.10
BTU: 0.76
The chart of Calmar ratio for AR, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
AR: 0.28
BTU: -0.74
The chart of Martin ratio for AR, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
AR: 0.97
BTU: -2.13

The current AR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AR and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.33
-1.24
AR
BTU

Dividends

AR vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AR
Antero Resources Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.58%0.99%2.20%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.87%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AR vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -98.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-30.74%
-75.07%
AR
BTU

Volatility

AR vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) is 19.65%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 23.52%. This indicates that AR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.65%
23.52%
AR
BTU

Financials

AR vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Resources Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab