PortfoliosLab logo
AR vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AR and BTU is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AR vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AR:

0.28

BTU:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

AR:

0.73

BTU:

-0.90

Omega Ratio

AR:

1.10

BTU:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

AR:

0.24

BTU:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

AR:

0.97

BTU:

-1.14

Ulcer Index

AR:

15.27%

BTU:

32.51%

Daily Std Dev

AR:

44.92%

BTU:

51.90%

Max Drawdown

AR:

-98.97%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

AR:

-39.27%

BTU:

-66.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AR:

$12.24B

BTU:

$1.79B

EPS

AR:

$0.77

BTU:

$2.70

PE Ratio

AR:

51.19

BTU:

5.45

PEG Ratio

AR:

0.49

BTU:

0.00

PS Ratio

AR:

2.66

BTU:

0.43

PB Ratio

AR:

1.71

BTU:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

AR:

$4.62B

BTU:

$4.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AR:

$5.14B

BTU:

$715.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

AR:

$1.08B

BTU:

$902.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -32.14% return.


AR

YTD

12.47%

1M

14.53%

6M

23.38%

1Y

12.63%

3Y*

3.77%

5Y*

66.72%

10Y*

-0.03%

BTU

YTD

-32.14%

1M

10.14%

6M

-46.32%

1Y

-36.54%

3Y*

-12.10%

5Y*

34.35%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Antero Resources Corporation

Peabody Energy Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AR vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AR is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AR is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AR is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AR is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AR is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AR is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AR vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AR Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AR and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AR vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

AR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AR
Antero Resources Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.58%0.99%2.20%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.13%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AR vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -98.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AR vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) is 12.60%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that AR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AR vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Resources Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
1.35B
937.00M
(AR) Total Revenue
(BTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AR vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Antero Resources Corporation and Peabody Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
93.4%
17.8%
(AR) Gross Margin
(BTU) Gross Margin
AR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.4%.

BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.80M and revenue of 937.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

AR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 271.47M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 31.90M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

AR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 207.97M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 38.30M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.