AR vs. CRK
AR (Antero Resources Corporation) and CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, AR returned 2.31%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for CRK. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AR vs. CRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AR achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than CRK's -41.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AR has underperformed CRK with an annualized return of 2.31%, while CRK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.54% annualized return.
AR
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- -6.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
CRK
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -22.52%
- YTD
- -41.98%
- 6M
- -46.96%
- 1Y
- -43.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
AR vs. CRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 5.22% | -1.68% | 54.54% | -26.82% | 77.09% | 221.10% | 91.23% | -69.65% | -50.58% | -19.66% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -41.98% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AR and CRK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AR and CRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AR:
$11.29B
CRK:
$3.92B
AR:
$3.08
CRK:
$2.23
AR:
11.76
CRK:
6.04
AR:
0.04
CRK:
0.03
AR:
1.97
CRK:
1.97
AR:
1.40
CRK:
1.42
AR:
$5.76B
CRK:
$2.01B
AR:
$2.60B
CRK:
$1.01B
AR:
$1.82B
CRK:
$1.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AR vs. CRK — Risk / Return Rank
AR
CRK
AR vs. CRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AR | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | -0.75 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.04 | -0.89 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.74 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | -1.18 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AR | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | -0.75 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.31 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
AR vs. CRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AR drawdown since its inception was -99.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CRK drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AR and CRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AR | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.01% | -99.32% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.77% | -57.12% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.19% | -57.12% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.39% | -64.25% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.78% | -68.63% | -29.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.21% | -96.54% | +50.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.38% | -62.61% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.46% | 35.84% | -15.38% |
Volatility
AR vs. CRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Antero Resources Corporation (AR) is 10.07%, while Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a volatility of 19.59%. This indicates that AR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AR | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 19.59% | -9.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 42.55% | -15.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.81% | 58.25% | -19.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.25% | 58.19% | -9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.73% | 68.67% | -7.94% |
Dividends
AR vs. CRK - Dividend Comparison
Neither AR nor CRK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% |
Financials
AR vs. CRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Antero Resources Corporation and Comstock Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AR vs. CRK - Profitability Comparison
AR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.82B and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.6%.
CRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 548.65M and revenue of 587.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.4%.
AR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 729.45M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
CRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.89M and revenue of 587.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
AR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 535.22M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 27.5%.
CRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 136.48M and revenue of 587.35M, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AR and CRK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (19.59%) compared to AR (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AR dropped -99.01% vs CRK's -99.32%.
AR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AR and CRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer