APP vs. ATMP
APP (AppLovin Corporation) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 5 years, APP returned 43.23%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APP vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APP achieves a -26.28% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return.
APP
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- -26.28%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 180.45%
- 5Y*
- 43.23%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
APP vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APP AppLovin Corporation | -26.28% | 108.08% | 712.62% | 278.44% | -88.83% | 34.66% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between APP and ATMP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between APP and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APP vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
APP
ATMP
APP vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 2.53 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 5.89 | -4.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APP vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than ATMP's maximum drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APP and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.90% | -80.86% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.99% | -7.30% | -42.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.00% | -16.48% | -40.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.90% | -22.98% | -68.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.28% | -5.61% | -26.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -31.08% | -11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.10% | 3.13% | +21.97% |
Volatility
APP vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
AppLovin Corporation (APP) has a higher volatility of 20.54% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that APP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APP | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.54% | 5.64% | +14.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.87% | 10.99% | +47.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.03% | 14.18% | +56.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.84% | 22.25% | +55.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.53% | 27.67% | +49.86% |
Dividends
APP vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither APP nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
APP and ATMP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APP has higher volatility (20.54%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APP dropped -91.90% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APP and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer