PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APP vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APP achieves a -40.72% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 37.73% return.


APP

1D
-4.49%
1M
-19.91%
6M
-26.35%
YTD
-40.72%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
133.79%
5Y*
45.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.02%

VRT

1D
-17.26%
1M
-27.34%
6M
15.16%
YTD
37.73%
1Y
56.47%
3Y*
105.09%
5Y*
51.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
48.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.29B$2.59B$2.67B
$1.65B$1.61B$1.92B

APP vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-40.72%108.08%712.62%278.44%-88.83%34.66%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
37.73%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between APP and VRT is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between APP and VRT has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APP:

$134.19B

VRT:

$85.67B

EPS

APP:

$11.66

VRT:

$4.42

PE Ratio

APP:

34.26

VRT:

50.44

PEG Ratio

APP:

0.10

VRT:

0.22

PS Ratio

APP:

22.02

VRT:

7.61

PB Ratio

APP:

57.25

VRT:

18.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

APP:

$6.16B

VRT:

$11.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APP:

$5.45B

VRT:

$4.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

APP:

$4.87B

VRT:

$2.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APP vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APPVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

1.39

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

4.91

-4.54

APP vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APP Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APP and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APP and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-71.24%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.99%

-40.70%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.00%

-61.28%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-71.24%

-20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.55%

-40.70%

-4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-16.26%

-26.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.05%

11.52%

+16.53%

Volatility

APP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AppLovin Corporation (APP) is 21.30%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 25.94%. This indicates that APP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

25.94%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.67%

52.62%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.27%

64.23%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.18%

63.39%

+14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.37%

55.29%

+22.08%

Dividends

APP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

APP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APP
AppLovin Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.10%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

APP vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AppLovin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

APP vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AppLovin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

APP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

APP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 78.2%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 637.90M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

APP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a net income of 1.21B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 65.4%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 497.80M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APP and VRT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (25.94%) compared to APP (21.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APP dropped -91.90% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APP and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer