PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APP vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APP achieves a -30.29% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 105.66% return.


APP

1D
-2.04%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-30.29%
6M
-32.35%
1Y
36.40%
3Y*
169.60%
5Y*
39.72%
10Y*

VRT

1D
4.87%
1M
3.25%
YTD
105.66%
6M
115.82%
1Y
179.99%
3Y*
145.68%
5Y*
66.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APP vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-30.29%108.08%712.62%278.44%-88.83%34.66%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
105.66%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between APP and VRT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between APP and VRT has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APP:

$159.10B

VRT:

$130.60B

EPS

APP:

$11.64

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

APP:

40.35

VRT:

83.56

PEG Ratio

APP:

0.12

VRT:

0.37

PS Ratio

APP:

25.94

VRT:

12.01

PB Ratio

APP:

67.32

VRT:

30.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

APP:

$6.16B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

APP:

$5.45B

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

APP:

$4.87B

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APP vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APPVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

7.16

-6.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

18.97

-17.53

APP vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APP Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APP and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APP and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APPVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-71.24%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.99%

-25.32%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.00%

-61.28%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-71.24%

-20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.97%

-11.46%

-24.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.49%

-16.23%

-26.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.28%

9.53%

+15.75%

Volatility

APP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

AppLovin Corporation (APP) has a higher volatility of 20.90% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 15.84%. This indicates that APP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APPVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.90%

15.84%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.13%

45.28%

+13.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.37%

58.58%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.94%

62.01%

+15.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.51%

54.65%

+22.86%

Dividends

APP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

APP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APP
AppLovin Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

APP vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AppLovin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.84B
2.65B
(APP) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

APP vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AppLovin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
89.0%
37.7%
Portfolio components
APP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

APP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 78.2%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

APP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a net income of 1.21B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 65.4%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APP and VRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APP has higher volatility (20.90%) compared to VRT (15.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APP dropped -91.90% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APP and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer