APP vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

APP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APP vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
APP AppLovin Corporation	-40.93%	108.08%	712.62%	278.44%	-88.83%	44.57%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	11.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap APP : $135.28B VRT : $98.15B
EPS APP : $9.78 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio APP : 40.71 VRT : 73.44
PEG Ratio APP : 0.12 VRT : 0.32
PS Ratio APP : 24.76 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio APP : 63.37 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) APP : $5.48B VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) APP : $4.82B VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) APP : $4.12B VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APP achieves a -40.93% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

APP

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -8.46%
• YTD: -40.93%
• 6M: -44.61%
• 1Y: 50.21%
• 3Y*: 193.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

APP vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APP

APP Risk / Return Rank: 64
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AppLovin Corporation (APP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APP	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	3.97	-3.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	3.91	-2.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.52	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	9.60	-8.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	27.88	-25.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APP vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APP Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APP and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APP	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	3.97	-3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.97	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between APP and VRT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

APP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

APP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APP AppLovin Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

APP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APP and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	APP	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.90%	-71.24%	-20.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.99%	-24.78%	-25.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.75%	-9.26%	-36.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-16.47%	-26.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.59%	8.53%	+12.06%

Volatility

APP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

AppLovin Corporation (APP) has a higher volatility of 21.74% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 20.14%. This indicates that APP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APP	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.74%	20.14%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.38%	45.36%	+13.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.93%	62.91%	+13.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.95%	61.08%	+16.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.95%	54.59%	+23.36%

Financials