APH vs. LIF
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and LIF (Life360, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — APH in Electronic Components, LIF in Software - Application. Over the past year, APH returned 67.47% vs -25.93% for LIF. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. LIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.
APH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 23.04%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 67.47%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 36.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APH vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 14.03% | 96.08% | 4.89% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and LIF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.30 |
The correlation between APH and LIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APH:
$198.36B
LIF:
$3.88B
APH:
$4.58
LIF:
$1.75
APH:
33.54
LIF:
25.86
APH:
7.62
LIF:
7.30
APH:
14.19
LIF:
6.49
APH:
$25.90B
LIF:
$528.98M
APH:
$9.67B
LIF:
$407.86M
APH:
$7.45B
LIF:
$26.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank
APH
LIF
APH vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APH | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.97 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | -0.43 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | -0.70 | +6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APH vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, roughly equal to the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and LIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -65.64% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -65.64% | +37.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -59.19% | +51.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -21.35% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.92% | 40.82% | -29.90% |
Volatility
APH vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 15.50%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.50% | 16.67% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 52.85% | -15.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.68% | 67.08% | -25.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 62.97% | -32.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.93% | 62.97% | -35.04% |
Dividends
APH vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
APH vs. LIF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Life360, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. LIF - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
LIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
LIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
LIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and LIF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to APH (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs LIF's -65.64%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and LIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer