ANGL vs. MFDX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANGL returned 3.26%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for MFDX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.

Performance

ANGL vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 8.03% return.

ANGL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 8.23%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

MFDX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.27%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	1.88%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	8.03%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	11.07%	6.90%	19.88%	-14.88%	7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and MFDX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017	0.61

The correlation between ANGL and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

ANGL vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANGL	MFDX
Financial Services	100.0%	16.4%
Basic Materials	-	10.8%
Communication Services	-	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.0%
Energy	-	6.8%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Industrials	-	19.9%
Real Estate	-	3.0%
Technology	-	7.1%
Utilities	-	6.4%

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 56
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 47
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.48	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.08	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.93	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	7.62	+0.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and MFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.48	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.64	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.53	+0.20

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and MFDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	MFDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-36.05%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-10.66%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-11.62%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-25.58%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-3.36%	+2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-6.49%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	2.70%	-1.74%

Volatility

ANGL vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.35%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	MFDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	4.25%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.50%	11.62%	-8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.34%	13.94%	-9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	15.07%	-7.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	16.42%	-7.14%

ANGL vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANGL vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than MFDX's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.39%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.84%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and MFDX in my portfolio?

ANGL and MFDX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANGL or MFDX?

MFDX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to ANGL (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs MFDX's -36.05%.

Which ETF is better, ANGL or MFDX?

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.63% vs 3.26% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANGL or MFDX?

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANGL or MFDX?

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANGL or MFDX?

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 2.84% for MFDX.

What is the main difference between ANGL and MFDX?

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.39% for MFDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.