ANGL vs. IGSB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB).
ANGL and IGSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. IGSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both ANGL and IGSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANGL or IGSB.
Key characteristics
| ANGL | IGSB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.26% | 4.52% |
| 1Y Return | 11.26% | 7.94% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.34% | 1.42% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.83% | 2.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.91% | 2.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.42 | 3.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.79 | 5.12 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.47 | 1.66 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.22 | 2.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.04 | 21.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.74% | 0.39% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.10% | 2.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.07% | -13.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.26% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and IGSB is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ANGL vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than IGSB's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has outperformed IGSB with an annualized return of 5.91%, while IGSB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANGL vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IGSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANGL vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANGL vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than IGSB's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.14% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.76% | 5.81% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
IGSB iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.26% | 2.06% | 1.82% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 2.46% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 0.94% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -35.07%, which is greater than IGSB's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and IGSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANGL vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.51%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.