ANGL vs. BLV
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV).
ANGL and BLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. BLV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both ANGL and BLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ANGL or BLV.
Performance
ANGL vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's -2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 6.15%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.
ANGL
6.03%
0.24%
4.94%
10.70%
5.09%
6.15%
BLV
-2.26%
-1.41%
2.54%
6.24%
-3.03%
1.46%
Key characteristics
| ANGL | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.20 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.37 | 0.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.30 | 0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.57 | 1.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.75% | 4.54% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.93% | 11.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.07% | -38.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.69% | -27.90% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANGL vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and BLV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ANGL vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ANGL vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than BLV's 4.53% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.09% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 5.84% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% | 3.90% | 4.85% |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -35.07%, smaller than the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and BLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ANGL vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.18%, while Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.