PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANF vs. GFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANF vs. GFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -28.04% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed GFF with an annualized return of 19.26%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively higher 22.94% annualized return.


ANF

1D
-0.06%
1M
25.97%
YTD
-28.04%
6M
-19.20%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
37.30%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
19.26%

GFF

1D
-1.66%
1M
13.38%
YTD
27.90%
6M
22.27%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
35.01%
10Y*
22.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANF vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
-28.04%-15.79%69.43%285.07%-34.22%71.07%19.48%-9.74%19.24%54.15%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
27.90%4.42%17.97%83.96%36.91%41.60%1.83%97.74%-44.92%-21.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ANF and GFF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANF:

$4.14B

GFF:

$4.28B

EPS

ANF:

$10.45

GFF:

$0.76

PE Ratio

ANF:

8.67

GFF:

124.05

PEG Ratio

ANF:

0.00

GFF:

1.61

PS Ratio

ANF:

0.81

GFF:

1.84

PB Ratio

ANF:

3.09

GFF:

45.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANF:

$5.28B

GFF:

$2.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANF:

$2.56B

GFF:

$1.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

ANF:

$727.85M

GFF:

$245.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANF vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANF
ANF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GFF
GFF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANF vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANFGFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

1.27

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

3.34

-2.72

ANF vs. GFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the GFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANF and GFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANF vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and GFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANFGFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.59%

-96.84%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.65%

-27.85%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.89%

-27.85%

-38.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.93%

-39.02%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.45%

-61.32%

-11.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.91%

-1.66%

-51.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.90%

-55.47%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.42%

10.61%

+13.81%

Volatility

ANF vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 15.82% compared to Griffon Corporation (GFF) at 12.72%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANFGFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.82%

12.72%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.52%

25.86%

+12.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.90%

36.24%

+25.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.04%

41.23%

+19.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.00%

45.37%

+15.63%

Dividends

ANF vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison

ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.98%4.63%3.99%4.59%6.67%2.96%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
0.90%1.03%0.88%4.10%6.62%1.16%1.50%1.44%12.27%1.23%0.80%0.96%

Financials

ANF vs. GFF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
1.11B
421.86M
(ANF) Total Revenue
(GFF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ANF vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Griffon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
45.5%
Portfolio components
ANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

ANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

GFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

ANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

GFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ANF and GFF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANF has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to GFF (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs GFF's -96.84%.

GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANF and GFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer