GFF vs. FSS
GFF (Griffon Corporation) and FSS (Federal Signal Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GFF in Tools & Accessories, FSS in Pollution & Treatment Controls. Over the past 10 years, GFF returned 21.59%/yr vs 26.96%/yr for FSS. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GFF vs. FSS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFF achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSS's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GFF has underperformed FSS with an annualized return of 21.59%, while FSS has yielded a comparatively higher 26.96% annualized return.
GFF
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.22%
- 5Y*
- 35.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.38%
FSS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 26.69%
- 10Y*
- 26.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.11M | $65.70M | $62.78M | |
| $25.01M | $26.26M | $31.76M |
GFF vs. FSS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 17.59% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 15.38% | 18.21% | 21.05% | 66.26% | 8.22% | 31.80% | 3.99% | 63.92% | 0.39% | 30.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFF and FSS is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1982 | 0.32 |
The correlation between GFF and FSS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFF:
$3.95B
FSS:
$7.62B
GFF:
$0.76
FSS:
$4.64
GFF:
113.38
FSS:
26.91
GFF:
1.47
FSS:
1.05
GFF:
1.68
FSS:
3.14
GFF:
41.69
FSS:
5.10
GFF:
$2.35B
FSS:
$2.45B
GFF:
$1.00B
FSS:
$699.90M
GFF:
$245.38M
FSS:
$459.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFF vs. FSS — Risk / Return Rank
GFF
FSS
GFF vs. FSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Federal Signal Corporation (FSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFF | FSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.04 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | -0.07 | +0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFF vs. FSS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFF drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than FSS's maximum drawdown of -83.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFF and FSS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFF | FSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.84% | -83.43% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.85% | -19.04% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.85% | -31.54% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.02% | -32.96% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.32% | -32.96% | -28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.65% | -6.66% | -4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.34% | -22.52% | -32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.70% | 11.41% | -0.71% |
Volatility
GFF vs. FSS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Griffon Corporation (GFF) is 9.79%, while Federal Signal Corporation (FSS) has a volatility of 16.17%. This indicates that GFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFF | FSS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 16.17% | -6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.77% | 27.90% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.36% | 34.29% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 31.49% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.51% | 31.98% | +13.53% |
Dividends
GFF vs. FSS - Dividend Comparison
GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than FSS's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSS Federal Signal Corporation | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.56% | 1.39% | 1.79% | 1.58% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.97% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
Financials
GFF vs. FSS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Griffon Corporation and Federal Signal Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFF vs. FSS - Profitability Comparison
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
FSS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a gross profit of 203.80M and revenue of 670.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
FSS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported an operating income of 118.20M and revenue of 670.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
FSS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Signal Corporation reported a net income of 86.10M and revenue of 670.20M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFF and FSS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSS has higher volatility (16.17%) compared to GFF (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFF dropped -96.84% vs FSS's -83.43%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFF and FSS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer