GFF vs. TGLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS).

Performance

GFF vs. TGLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GFF vs. TGLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFF Griffon Corporation	-1.06%	4.42%	17.97%	83.96%	36.91%	41.60%	1.83%	97.74%	-44.92%	-21.43%
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc.	-11.16%	-35.98%	74.88%	49.86%	18.91%	281.83%	-14.53%	10.03%	15.12%	-36.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFF : $3.33B TGLS : $2.04B
EPS GFF : $0.97 TGLS : $3.42
PE Ratio GFF : 75.25 TGLS : 13.01
PEG Ratio GFF : 0.98 TGLS : 0.38
PS Ratio GFF : 1.32 TGLS : 2.11
PB Ratio GFF : 30.54 TGLS : 2.87
Total Revenue (TTM) GFF : $2.54B TGLS : $983.61M
Gross Profit (TTM) GFF : $1.06B TGLS : $421.41M
EBITDA (TTM) GFF : $261.84M TGLS : $274.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFF achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly higher than TGLS's -11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GFF has outperformed TGLS with an annualized return of 20.49%, while TGLS has yielded a comparatively lower 17.59% annualized return.

GFF

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: -14.73%
• YTD: -1.06%
• 6M: -4.03%
• 1Y: 2.72%
• 3Y*: 35.72%
• 5Y*: 26.00%
• 10Y*: 20.49%

TGLS

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: -11.16%
• 6M: -32.99%
• 1Y: -37.08%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 31.03%
• 10Y*: 17.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GFF vs. TGLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFF

GFF Risk / Return Rank: 43
GFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GFF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GFF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

TGLS

TGLS Risk / Return Rank: 13
TGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFF vs. TGLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFF	TGLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-0.87	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	-1.26	+1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.86	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	-0.67	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.42	-1.17	+1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFF vs. TGLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the TGLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFF and TGLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFF	TGLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	-0.87	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.55	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.33	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.28	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between GFF and TGLS is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GFF vs. TGLS - Dividend Comparison

GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than TGLS's 1.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFF Griffon Corporation	1.10%	1.03%	0.88%	4.10%	6.62%	1.16%	1.50%	1.44%	12.27%	1.23%	0.80%	0.96%
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc.	1.35%	1.19%	0.61%	0.79%	0.91%	0.56%	1.59%	6.79%	5.20%	7.21%	2.04%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GFF vs. TGLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFF drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than TGLS's maximum drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFF and TGLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFF	TGLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.84%	-81.32%	-15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.85%	-53.96%	+26.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.02%	-53.96%	+14.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.32%	-77.98%	+16.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.17%	-49.08%	+25.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.65%	-22.55%	-33.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.08%	31.03%	-20.95%

Volatility

GFF vs. TGLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Griffon Corporation (GFF) is 10.59%, while Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that GFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFF	TGLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	13.43%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.42%	27.27%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.76%	42.55%	-5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.82%	57.04%	-16.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.08%	54.24%	-9.16%

Financials

GFF vs. TGLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Griffon Corporation and Tecnoglass Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.77M and revenue of 649.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

TGLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.23M and revenue of 245.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

GFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 113.36M and revenue of 649.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

TGLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported an operating income of 44.83M and revenue of 245.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

GFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 64.39M and revenue of 649.09M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

TGLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a net income of 26.11M and revenue of 245.30M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.