PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFF vs. SUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFF vs. SUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Sunoco LP (SUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFF achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly lower than SUN's 23.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GFF has outperformed SUN with an annualized return of 22.60%, while SUN has yielded a comparatively lower 17.87% annualized return.


GFF

1D
-1.87%
1M
5.62%
YTD
22.04%
6M
17.24%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
35.03%
5Y*
33.30%
10Y*
22.60%

SUN

1D
-1.18%
1M
-10.75%
YTD
23.47%
6M
22.89%
1Y
25.23%
3Y*
20.84%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
17.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFF vs. SUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFF
Griffon Corporation
22.04%4.42%17.97%83.96%36.91%41.60%1.83%97.74%-44.92%-21.43%
SUN
Sunoco LP
23.47%8.88%-8.59%49.38%13.95%55.26%6.28%24.78%7.71%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GFF and SUN is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.17

The correlation between GFF and SUN shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFF:

$4.09B

SUN:

$3.23T

EPS

GFF:

$0.76

SUN:

$0.06

PE Ratio

GFF:

118.37

SUN:

976.05

PS Ratio

GFF:

1.76

SUN:

40.71

PB Ratio

GFF:

43.26

SUN:

1.25K

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFF:

$2.35B

SUN:

$20.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFF:

$1.00B

SUN:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

GFF:

$245.38M

SUN:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFF vs. SUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFF
GFF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SUN
SUN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFF vs. SUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Sunoco LP (SUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFFSUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.94

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

5.31

-2.32

GFF vs. SUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the SUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFF and SUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFF vs. SUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFF drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than SUN's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFF and SUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFFSUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.84%

-65.47%

-31.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.85%

-13.09%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.85%

-21.29%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.02%

-21.29%

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.32%

-62.94%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-13.09%

+6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-16.30%

-39.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.62%

4.76%

+5.86%

Volatility

GFF vs. SUN - Volatility Comparison

Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to Sunoco LP (SUN) at 7.94%. This indicates that GFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFFSUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

7.94%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.63%

17.09%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.66%

23.16%

+13.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.30%

23.65%

+17.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.43%

31.74%

+13.69%

Dividends

GFF vs. SUN - Dividend Comparison

GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SUN's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFF
Griffon Corporation
0.94%1.03%0.88%4.10%6.62%1.16%1.50%1.44%12.27%1.23%0.80%0.96%
SUN
Sunoco LP
5.98%6.89%6.74%5.59%7.66%8.09%11.47%10.79%12.14%11.63%12.16%6.78%

Financials

GFF vs. SUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Griffon Corporation and Sunoco LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
421.86M
0
(GFF) Total Revenue
(SUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GFF and SUN have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFF has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to SUN (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFF dropped -96.84% vs SUN's -65.47%.

SUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFF and SUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer