ANF vs. CW
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ANF returned 18.54%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for CW. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANF vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -26.86% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 31.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 18.54%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.
ANF
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 36.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
CW
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- 31.08%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.03%
- 5Y*
- 44.53%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.27%
ANF vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -26.86% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 31.08% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and CW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1996 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ANF and CW shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ANF:
$4.09B
CW:
$26.67B
ANF:
$10.45
CW:
$13.69
ANF:
8.81
CW:
52.76
ANF:
0.00
CW:
2.88
ANF:
0.82
CW:
7.48
ANF:
3.14
CW:
10.17
ANF:
$5.28B
CW:
$3.61B
ANF:
$2.56B
CW:
$1.34B
ANF:
$727.85M
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
CW
ANF vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANF | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.26 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 3.93 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 10.79 | -10.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANF vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -59.19% | -27.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -12.97% | -32.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -27.21% | -38.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -27.21% | -42.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | -48.73% | -23.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.14% | -8.92% | -43.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.94% | -13.87% | -29.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.21% | 4.71% | +21.50% |
Volatility
ANF vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 9.62%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | 9.62% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.16% | 25.81% | +7.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.93% | 33.79% | +28.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 27.93% | +33.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.01% | 30.37% | +30.64% |
Dividends
ANF vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
ANF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
ANF vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and CW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (11.65%) compared to CW (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs CW's -59.19%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer