AMR vs. RIG
AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) and RIG (Transocean Ltd.) are both stocks. AMR operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while RIG operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy). Over the past 5 years, AMR returned 47.09%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for RIG. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMR vs. RIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a -15.86% return, which is significantly lower than RIG's 26.15% return.
AMR
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -12.78%
- YTD
- -15.86%
- 6M
- -19.10%
- 1Y
- 69.09%
- 3Y*
- 1.43%
- 5Y*
- 47.09%
- 10Y*
- —
RIG
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -19.60%
- YTD
- 26.15%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 97.35%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- -6.86%
AMR vs. RIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | -15.86% | -0.12% | -40.95% | 133.87% | 150.06% | 436.94% | 25.64% | -86.23% | 10.71% | -4.69% |
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 26.15% | 10.13% | -40.94% | 39.25% | 65.22% | 19.48% | -66.42% | -0.86% | -35.02% | -12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMR and RIG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.33 |
The correlation between AMR and RIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMR:
$2.15B
RIG:
$5.86B
AMR:
-$3.00
RIG:
-$2.85
AMR:
1.02
RIG:
1.65
AMR:
1.42
RIG:
0.71
AMR:
$2.12B
RIG:
$3.06B
AMR:
$31.72M
RIG:
$1.97B
AMR:
$128.60M
RIG:
-$2.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMR vs. RIG — Risk / Return Rank
AMR
RIG
AMR vs. RIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMR | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.92 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 10.93 | -6.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMR vs. RIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, roughly equal to the maximum RIG drawdown of -99.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and RIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMR | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.35% | -99.47% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.85% | -33.51% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.51% | -75.80% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.51% | -75.80% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.97% | -95.90% | +33.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -57.20% | +16.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 8.94% | +7.62% |
Volatility
AMR vs. RIG - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a higher volatility of 20.38% compared to Transocean Ltd. (RIG) at 13.35%. This indicates that AMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMR | RIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.38% | 13.35% | +7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.01% | 38.80% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.91% | 54.60% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 62.49% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.64% | 74.53% | -0.89% |
Dividends
AMR vs. RIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMR nor RIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIG Transocean Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.48% |
Financials
AMR vs. RIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Transocean Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AMR and RIG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to RIG (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMR dropped -97.35% vs RIG's -99.47%.
RIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMR and RIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer