PortfoliosLab logo
AMR vs. MLM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMR and MLM is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AMR vs. MLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMR:

-1.14

MLM:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

AMR:

-1.90

MLM:

0.04

Omega Ratio

AMR:

0.78

MLM:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

AMR:

-0.76

MLM:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

AMR:

-1.42

MLM:

-0.20

Ulcer Index

AMR:

40.34%

MLM:

12.87%

Daily Std Dev

AMR:

51.87%

MLM:

25.77%

Max Drawdown

AMR:

-97.35%

MLM:

-63.73%

Current Drawdown

AMR:

-72.15%

MLM:

-8.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMR:

$1.61B

MLM:

$33.98B

EPS

AMR:

$2.04

MLM:

$17.44

PE Ratio

AMR:

60.31

MLM:

32.32

PS Ratio

AMR:

0.61

MLM:

5.12

PB Ratio

AMR:

1.01

MLM:

3.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMR:

$2.63B

MLM:

$6.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMR:

$140.38M

MLM:

$1.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMR:

$204.62M

MLM:

$1.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a -38.46% return, which is significantly lower than MLM's 9.30% return.


AMR

YTD

-38.46%

1M

-0.85%

6M

-48.97%

1Y

-58.67%

3Y*

-5.08%

5Y*

111.44%

10Y*

N/A

MLM

YTD

9.30%

1M

14.04%

6M

-2.99%

1Y

-2.78%

3Y*

20.58%

5Y*

26.72%

10Y*

14.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMR vs. MLM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMR is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMR is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMR is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMR is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMR is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMR is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLM is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLM is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLM is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLM is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLM is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLM is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMR vs. MLM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMR Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the MLM Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMR and MLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AMR vs. MLM - Dividend Comparison

AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.57%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
0.55%0.59%0.56%0.75%0.54%0.79%0.74%1.07%0.78%0.74%1.17%1.45%

Drawdowns

AMR vs. MLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than MLM's maximum drawdown of -63.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and MLM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AMR vs. MLM - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) at 6.54%. This indicates that AMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AMR vs. MLM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
531.96M
1.35B
(AMR) Total Revenue
(MLM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMR vs. MLM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
-3.4%
24.8%
(AMR) Gross Margin
(MLM) Gross Margin
AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of -17.89M and revenue of 531.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -3.4%.

MLM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 335.00M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -40.18M and revenue of 531.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.6%.

MLM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 194.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -33.95M and revenue of 531.96M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.

MLM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.