AMR vs. XME

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME).

XME is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006.

Performance

AMR vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMR vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	2.70%	-0.12%	-40.95%	133.87%	150.06%	436.94%	25.64%	-86.23%	10.71%	-4.69%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	4.31%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	24.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 4.31% return.

AMR

• 1D: -4.19%
• 1M: 26.20%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 25.10%
• 1Y: 63.89%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: 75.98%
• 10Y*: —

XME

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -9.45%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: 93.75%
• 3Y*: 27.50%
• 5Y*: 22.88%
• 10Y*: 19.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMR vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMR

AMR Risk / Return Rank: 75
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 69
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 94
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMR vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMR	XME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.63	-1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.07	-1.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	4.05	-2.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	11.64	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMR vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMR and XME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMR	XME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	2.63	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.27	0.71	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.15	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between AMR and XME is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMR vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.35%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Drawdowns

AMR vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than XME's maximum drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and XME.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMR	XME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.35%	-85.89%	-11.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.85%	-22.60%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.51%	-37.27%	-40.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.58%	-17.77%	-35.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.03%	-44.45%	+4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.38%	7.87%	+5.51%

Volatility

AMR vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a higher volatility of 17.05% compared to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) at 11.55%. This indicates that AMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMR	XME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.05%	11.55%	+5.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.42%	28.02%	+10.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.04%	35.81%	+24.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.40%	32.46%	+27.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.94%	32.98%	+40.96%