AMR vs. ANF
AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. AMR operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, AMR returned 38.34%/yr vs 24.61%/yr for ANF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMR vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a -26.90% return, which is significantly lower than ANF's -13.05% return.
AMR
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -30.01%
- YTD
- -26.90%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- -6.00%
- 5Y*
- 38.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- -13.05%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 40.78%
- 5Y*
- 24.61%
- 10Y*
- 19.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $49.49M | $41.21M | $46.74M | |
| $101.86M | $96.61M | $111.54M |
AMR vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | -26.90% | -0.12% | -40.95% | 133.87% | 150.06% | 436.94% | 25.64% | -86.23% | 10.71% | -4.69% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -13.05% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 61.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMR and ANF is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AMR and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMR:
$1.86B
ANF:
$4.86B
AMR:
-$3.01
ANF:
$10.55
AMR:
0.89
ANF:
0.97
AMR:
1.23
ANF:
3.73
AMR:
$2.12B
ANF:
$5.28B
AMR:
$31.72M
ANF:
$2.56B
AMR:
$128.60M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMR vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
AMR
ANF
AMR vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMR | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.22 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 0.38 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMR vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than ANF's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMR | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.35% | -86.59% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.06% | -45.65% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.51% | -65.89% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.51% | -69.93% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.96% | -43.10% | -23.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.74% | -42.94% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.18% | 26.62% | -5.44% |
Volatility
AMR vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) is 11.76%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 15.89%. This indicates that AMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMR | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 15.89% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.49% | 35.14% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.06% | 62.18% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.93% | 61.14% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.33% | 61.12% | +12.21% |
Dividends
AMR vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMR nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
Financials
AMR vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMR vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
AMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
AMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMR and ANF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to AMR (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMR dropped -97.35% vs ANF's -86.59%.
AMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMR and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer