PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIG vs. NE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIG vs. NE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Noble Corporation (NE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a 49.64% return, which is significantly lower than NE's 67.02% return.


RIG

1D
-1.12%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
49.64%
6M
38.88%
1Y
127.21%
3Y*
-2.07%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
-4.45%

NE

1D
-1.02%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
67.02%
6M
42.41%
1Y
84.69%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIG vs. NE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
49.64%10.13%-40.94%39.25%65.22%-33.65%
NE
Noble Corporation
67.02%-3.21%-31.57%29.54%52.00%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RIG and NE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.71

The correlation between RIG and NE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIG:

$6.95B

NE:

$7.51B

EPS

RIG:

-$2.85

NE:

$1.43

PS Ratio

RIG:

1.96

NE:

2.34

PB Ratio

RIG:

0.85

NE:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIG:

$3.06B

NE:

$3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIG:

$1.97B

NE:

$716.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIG:

-$2.10B

NE:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIG vs. NE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIG
RIG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NE
NE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIG vs. NE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Noble Corporation (NE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIGNEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.14

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

11.37

+2.95

RIG vs. NE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIG and NE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIGNEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.09

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.39

-0.41

Drawdowns

RIG vs. NE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than NE's maximum drawdown of -63.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and NE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIGNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.47%

-63.16%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.19%

-16.56%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.80%

-63.16%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.13%

-14.20%

-80.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.14%

-19.54%

-37.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

7.47%

+1.45%

Volatility

RIG vs. NE - Volatility Comparison

Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a higher volatility of 17.56% compared to Noble Corporation (NE) at 9.89%. This indicates that RIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIGNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

9.89%

+7.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.66%

29.66%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.19%

40.87%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.73%

43.43%

+19.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.70%

43.43%

+31.27%

Dividends

RIG vs. NE - Dividend Comparison

RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NE
Noble Corporation
4.29%7.08%5.73%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.48%

Financials

RIG vs. NE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transocean Ltd. and Noble Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B202220232024202520260
785.69M
(RIG) Total Revenue
(NE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIG and NE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIG has higher volatility (17.56%) compared to NE (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIG dropped -99.47% vs NE's -63.16%.

RIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIG and NE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer