RIG vs. NE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Noble Corporation (NE).

Performance

RIG vs. NE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Noble Corporation (NE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RIG vs. NE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RIG Transocean Ltd.	57.38%	10.13%	-40.94%	39.25%	65.22%	-33.65%
NE Noble Corporation	73.64%	-3.21%	-31.57%	29.54%	52.00%	0.24%

Fundamentals

EPS RIG : -$4.86 NE : $1.35
Total Revenue (TTM) RIG : $2.92B NE : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) RIG : -$2.41B NE : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) RIG : -$1.00B NE : $583.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a 57.38% return, which is significantly lower than NE's 73.64% return.

RIG

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 57.38%
• 6M: 101.24%
• 1Y: 95.78%
• 3Y*: 0.73%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: -2.74%

NE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 73.64%
• 6M: 70.53%
• 1Y: 111.09%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RIG vs. NE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIG

RIG Risk / Return Rank: 81
RIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RIG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
RIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RIG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

NE

NE Risk / Return Rank: 91
NE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIG vs. NE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Noble Corporation (NE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIG	NE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.26	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.68	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	4.77	-1.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	13.64	-6.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIG vs. NE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the NE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIG and NE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIG	NE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.26	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.43	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between RIG and NE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RIG vs. NE - Dividend Comparison

RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RIG Transocean Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.48%
NE Noble Corporation	4.12%	7.08%	5.73%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RIG vs. NE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than NE's maximum drawdown of -63.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and NE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIG	NE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.47%	-63.16%	-36.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.59%	-23.83%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.88%	-2.67%	-92.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.94%	-20.04%	-36.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.08%	8.64%	+5.44%

Volatility

RIG vs. NE - Volatility Comparison

Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to Noble Corporation (NE) at 9.37%. This indicates that RIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIG	NE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.78%	9.37%	+5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.52%	29.70%	+7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.02%	49.56%	+14.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.40%	43.59%	+19.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.82%	43.59%	+31.23%

Financials