PortfoliosLab logo
RIG vs. HAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RIG and HAL is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RIG vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RIG:

-0.98

HAL:

-1.15

Sortino Ratio

RIG:

-1.47

HAL:

-1.68

Omega Ratio

RIG:

0.83

HAL:

0.79

Calmar Ratio

RIG:

-0.58

HAL:

-0.64

Martin Ratio

RIG:

-1.52

HAL:

-1.69

Ulcer Index

RIG:

37.76%

HAL:

26.13%

Daily Std Dev

RIG:

60.82%

HAL:

39.17%

Max Drawdown

RIG:

-99.48%

HAL:

-92.99%

Current Drawdown

RIG:

-98.01%

HAL:

-66.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIG:

$2.29B

HAL:

$17.94B

EPS

RIG:

-$0.98

HAL:

$2.39

PEG Ratio

RIG:

-22.91

HAL:

11.83

PS Ratio

RIG:

0.62

HAL:

0.80

PB Ratio

RIG:

0.23

HAL:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIG:

$3.67B

HAL:

$22.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIG:

$2.50B

HAL:

$4.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIG:

$627.00M

HAL:

$4.32B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a -32.00% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's -24.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RIG has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -18.52%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher -6.03% annualized return.


RIG

YTD

-32.00%

1M

11.84%

6M

-39.29%

1Y

-59.13%

3Y*

-13.21%

5Y*

11.65%

10Y*

-18.52%

HAL

YTD

-24.14%

1M

-9.10%

6M

-31.95%

1Y

-44.78%

3Y*

-16.11%

5Y*

13.05%

10Y*

-6.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Transocean Ltd.

Halliburton Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RIG vs. HAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIG is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIG is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIG is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIG is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIG is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIG is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HAL is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HAL is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HAL is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HAL is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HAL is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HAL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RIG vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is comparable to the HAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIG and HAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RIG vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RIG
Transocean Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.48%15.33%
HAL
Halliburton Company
3.32%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%1.60%

Drawdowns

RIG vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, which is greater than HAL's maximum drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and HAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RIG vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 11.76%. This indicates that RIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RIG vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transocean Ltd. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
906.00M
5.42B
(RIG) Total Revenue
(HAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIG vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Transocean Ltd. and Halliburton Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
31.8%
16.2%
(RIG) Gross Margin
(HAL) Gross Margin
RIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported a gross profit of 288.00M and revenue of 906.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

HAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 879.00M and revenue of 5.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.2%.

RIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 906.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

HAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 431.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

RIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Transocean Ltd. reported a net income of -79.00M and revenue of 906.00M, resulting in a net margin of -8.7%.

HAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 204.00M and revenue of 5.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.