RIG vs. HAL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Company (HAL).

Performance

RIG vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RIG vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RIG Transocean Ltd.	60.53%	10.13%	-40.94%	39.25%	65.22%	19.48%	-66.42%	-0.86%	-35.02%	-27.54%
HAL Halliburton Company	38.64%	7.02%	-23.19%	-6.47%	74.45%	21.99%	-21.23%	-4.90%	-44.63%	-8.18%

Fundamentals

EPS RIG : -$4.86 HAL : $1.51
PS Ratio RIG : 1.36 HAL : 1.50
Total Revenue (TTM) RIG : $2.92B HAL : $22.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) RIG : -$2.41B HAL : $3.50B
EBITDA (TTM) RIG : -$1.00B HAL : $3.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIG achieves a 60.53% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's 38.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RIG has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -2.55%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.03% annualized return.

RIG

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 60.53%
• 6M: 112.50%
• 1Y: 109.15%
• 3Y*: 1.40%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: -2.55%

HAL

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 8.83%
• YTD: 38.64%
• 6M: 60.28%
• 1Y: 57.90%
• 3Y*: 9.69%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RIG vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIG

RIG Risk / Return Rank: 84
RIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RIG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
RIG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

HAL

HAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIG vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIG	HAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.31	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.91	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	2.39	+0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	4.99	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIG vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIG and HAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIG	HAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.31	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.36	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03	0.07	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.14	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between RIG and HAL is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RIG vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

RIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RIG Transocean Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.48%
HAL Halliburton Company	1.74%	2.41%	2.50%	1.77%	1.22%	0.79%	1.67%	2.94%	2.71%	1.47%	1.33%	2.12%

Drawdowns

RIG vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIG drawdown since its inception was -99.47%, which is greater than HAL's maximum drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIG and HAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIG	HAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.47%	-92.99%	-6.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.84%	-25.06%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.80%	-54.01%	-21.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.77%	-91.45%	-4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.78%	-34.20%	-60.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.94%	-39.15%	-17.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.08%	11.98%	+2.10%

Volatility

RIG vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

Transocean Ltd. (RIG) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 10.26%. This indicates that RIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIG	HAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.83%	10.26%	+4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.43%	26.13%	+11.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.99%	44.35%	+19.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.40%	40.38%	+23.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.83%	45.95%	+28.88%

Financials