PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMR vs. HCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMR vs. HCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMR achieves a -7.06% return, which is significantly lower than HCC's 2.92% return.


AMR

1D
-3.93%
1M
7.86%
YTD
-7.06%
6M
-10.71%
1Y
73.60%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
56.18%
10Y*

HCC

1D
-4.72%
1M
6.00%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.79%
1Y
110.65%
3Y*
37.28%
5Y*
43.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMR vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
-7.06%-0.12%-40.95%133.87%150.06%436.94%25.64%-86.23%10.71%-13.31%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
2.92%63.49%-9.79%81.59%41.03%21.82%2.30%1.98%23.20%131.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AMR and HCC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017

0.56

Over the past year, AMR and HCC have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMR:

$2.38B

HCC:

$4.78B

EPS

AMR:

-$3.00

HCC:

$2.61

PS Ratio

AMR:

1.13

HCC:

3.25

PB Ratio

AMR:

1.57

HCC:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMR:

$2.12B

HCC:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMR:

$31.72M

HCC:

$887.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMR:

$128.60M

HCC:

$296.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMR vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMR
AMR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HCC
HCC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMR vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMRHCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.85

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

9.49

-5.71

AMR vs. HCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the HCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMR and HCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMR vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMR drawdown since its inception was -97.35%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMR and HCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMRHCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.35%

-64.81%

-32.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.85%

-24.41%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.51%

-45.53%

-31.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.51%

-45.53%

-31.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.99%

-17.86%

-40.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-18.09%

-22.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.14%

9.98%

+6.16%

Volatility

AMR vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) is 21.21%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 24.34%. This indicates that AMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMRHCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

24.34%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.84%

36.69%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.88%

57.43%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.62%

49.69%

+9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.65%

52.52%

+21.13%

Dividends

AMR vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison

AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
0.35%0.36%1.51%1.90%4.45%0.78%0.94%21.85%27.91%45.17%

Financials

AMR vs. HCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
524.99M
458.59M
(AMR) Total Revenue
(HCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMR vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
98.2%
Portfolio components
AMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 524.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

AMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.59M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

AMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -11.03M and revenue of 524.99M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMR and HCC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCC has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to AMR (21.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMR dropped -97.35% vs HCC's -64.81%.

HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMR and HCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer