AMOM vs. PIE
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. AMOM is actively managed, while PIE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.57%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for PIE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
AMOM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 26.64% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 40.45% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 26.64%
- 6M
- 27.60%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 40.45%
- 6M
- 39.95%
- 1Y
- 74.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
AMOM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 26.64% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 13.08% | 53.81% | 9.33% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 40.45% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and PIE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between AMOM and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMOM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
PIE
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
AMOM
PIE
Industrials
AMOM
PIE
Communication Services
AMOM
PIE
Healthcare
AMOM
PIE
Financial Services
AMOM
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
PIE
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
PIE
Utilities
AMOM
PIE
Basic Materials
AMOM
PIE
Real Estate
AMOM
PIE
Energy
AMOM
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
PIE
AMOM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMOM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 3.42 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 4.05 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.58 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 7.71 | -4.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 25.33 | -13.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMOM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 3.42 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.37 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.12 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -72.98% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -9.87% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -28.69% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -40.32% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -26.09% | +15.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.01% | +0.63% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is 7.14%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that AMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 8.92% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.72% | 17.73% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 21.88% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 20.23% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 21.35% | +3.61% |
AMOM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PIE's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.68% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and PIE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to AMOM (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.57% vs 7.36% for PIE. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer