AMOM vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. AMOM is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.75%/yr vs 24.25%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

AMOM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 32.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 36.08% return.

AMOM

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 10.77%
• YTD: 32.52%
• 6M: 30.51%
• 1Y: 48.40%
• 3Y*: 28.43%
• 5Y*: 12.75%
• 10Y*: —

SPMO

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 11.71%
• YTD: 36.08%
• 6M: 35.05%
• 1Y: 52.78%
• 3Y*: 44.69%
• 5Y*: 24.25%
• 10Y*: 21.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	32.52%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	36.08%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	22.64%	28.25%	7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and SPMO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.84

The correlation between AMOM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMOM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMOM	SPMO
Technology	50.2%	56.8%
Industrials	21.9%	10.9%
Energy	11.8%	2.8%
Healthcare	7.7%	5.9%
Communication Services	7.4%	8.0%
Financial Services	6.2%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.8%
Basic Materials	4.6%	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.0%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.9%
Utilities	1.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 65
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 83
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.65	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.46	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.48	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	4.18	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.88	15.78	-2.90

AMOM vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	-30.95%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-12.70%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	-20.13%	-10.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-22.74%	-16.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-4.59%	-6.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	3.35%	+0.42%

Volatility

AMOM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.55%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.18%	10.55%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.18%	17.11%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	20.05%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.18%	19.77%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.17%	20.55%	+4.62%

AMOM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SPMO's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.78%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and SPMO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, AMOM and SPMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AMOM or SPMO?

AMOM has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to SPMO (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or SPMO?

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.25% vs 12.75% for AMOM. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMOM or SPMO?

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or SPMO?

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between AMOM and SPMO?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.13% for SPMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.